> See the above reasoning. Plus anecdotal evidence is often useless > because it's not repeatable and it is not done in large enough numbers > with proper controls to show any trends or reach any useful > conclusions. I got flamed last time I knocked anecdotal evidence on > rec.scuba but if anyone flames me for it here, where *supposedly* you > know better, you can get out the kneepads. Data gleaned from controlled experiments is always more useful than anecdote. However, for many aspects of diving physiology, we don't have the luxury of such data. The question then becomes, do we assume we know nothing, or do we look at anecdote with a handful of salt thrown in? The asnwer, of course, depends on many different things. Aloha, Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]