Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
> From: "A.Appleyard" <A.APPLEYARD@fs*.mt*.um*.ac*.uk*>
>
> Roderick Farb wrote:-
> > ... The words "air" and "deep" are part of the English language and are not
> > offensive to most people. ...
> >
> Roger Herring <afn03632@fr*.uf*.ed*> replied:-
> > It's hard to be offended when you're dead! ...
>
> I.e. the sum of all the flaming that has been (once Stroke-slam's `absolute
> pussy' has been found a good home with plenty of mice for it to catch, and all
> the toilet and porn language has been moved to my emailer's `Deleted Messages'
> folder, which like a toilet is flushed when I exit from email), is:-
>
> A> Deep diving on ordinary air is dangerous because of nitrogen narcosis.
> B> Some people claim to be able to dive deep on air despite this.
There is a C with bother me: people are diving deep air because of
insurance compagny... Usually these are quick to get their liability
void if you do something dangerous. So I conclude that they think that
it is more dangerous to sucba dive with trimix than with air.
Have I misunderstood the fact that the regulation preventing some to
dive with mix came from insurance compagny ? Do I mis something else ?
Please, if you have elements of answer, don't hide them in flames.
> This has long been known. Between these two there will always be dispute;
> but I thought that this is why people are going in for nitrox and heliox etc
> and made the email group Techdiver to discuss it, in the first place.
Sorry, about deep air.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jean-Marc Bourguet Service d'Electronique
Faculte polytechnique de Mons
Email : bourguet@mu*.fp*.ac*.be* Belgique
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]