ANDI standards require a current ANDI instructor (the editorial "you" referred to below) to be present and in control of all ANDI course activities. The ANDI Limited and Complete SafeAir User programs (ie training levels 1 and 2) allow you to use instructor discretion permitting direct or indirect supervision during Part 2 in-water activities. This has *always* been an ANDI standard. The concepts of indirect and direct supervision and their differences were not invented by ANDI. Their bases are in the RSTC standards. This discussion refers *only* to ANDI Level 1 and 2 training. Other programs have other requirements. Your responsibilities under Part 2 include, but are not limited to, supervising gas analysis and recording, predive planning, administering an exam (it need not be on the boat) and supervising the water experience. The term "Part 2" is used specifically instead of "open water" to emphasize that there is more happening than just "going diving". With regard only to the diving aspect of Part 2: You, the instructor, are required to be personally present at entry/exit point, approve the diving activity, oversee the planning and preparation and the equipment inspections. You maintain overall control of the events taking place and must be *prepared* to enter the water to aid and assist students should the need arise. This means you cannot leave your dive gear at home. It also means you can dive if you want to, or for whatever reason, feel you should. There is no prohibition against diving. Someone suggested a hypothetical example of an instructor sleeping while his students are diving: You are not prepared to enter the water so you are not properly supervising your activity. But there is more at work here than the printed standard alone. There is the spirit and also a reasonable standard of behavior. As an instructor, you are a leader, a role model. You are conducting a program whose goal is to pass on knowledge, provide somewhat controlled conditions to experience new things, and inspire. Your students have the right to expect your undivided body and attention. There is a direct relationship between your physical and mental condition and the quality of your teaching and the respect you cultivate in your students. You cannot have the flu, be hungover, or in a thousand other ways be in unacceptable condition or unprepared to conduct your class, contingencies included. We've heard this time and again - good instructor/bad agency vs. bad instructor/good agency. If you sleep on the job you are making a strong statement about your own conscientiousness not about your agency affiliation. If you feel the standard is "ridiculous", then dive, by all means. In this hypothetical example, are you, the instructor, demonstrating your "cut above" character, are you going above and beyond? Are you doing all you can to make this the best learning experience possible for your students? Is it OK to sleep because you are not *required* to dive? Of course not. Read the plain language of the standards. You are doing as little as possible and then hiding behind an incorrect analysis of the standard. You have acknowledged you are unprepared, unwilling or in some other way unable to dive. You are not in position to conduct this program in the first place. The bizarre irony of the hypothetical is to first characterize the standard as "ridiculous" and then to justify the inability to carry out the instructor responsibilities by invoking it. While asleep you are not in control of a situation or prepared to enter the water. It is difficult to believe that by suggesting this hypothetical example, anyone would consider this acceptable behavior for any instructor under any circumstances. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stuart Masch, Chief Operating Officer American Nitrox Divers International
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]