> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 19:44:39 -0400 > Message-ID: <950919194438_103617590@em*.ma*.ao*.co*> > To: kevink@ap*.co* > cc: techdiver@terra.net > Subject: Re: STANDARDS > Status: U > > > I was reading your posting and I wonder > > if we're getting caught up (and students > > are getting caught up) in a semantic problem. > > Yes I think this is much of the problem. I rambled a bit in my post but my > main point is that a standard is something that is taught...not mandated. > Compliance with the standard is subject to freedom of choice (as it should > be). > > Win > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. > > > > ---- End Forwarded Message > > From the standpoint of semantics 'standard' implies a set of criteria that all > practicing said activity/function aspire or are held to achieving/maintaining. > > Hence the term 'national' or 'international standards', & many idioms using 'standard' > to conjure up 'compliance with established norms'. > > Again the unitless 0.02 > > Regards > Esat Atikkan ---- End Forwarded Message
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]