Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@terra.net
From: iantdhq@ga*.ne* (iantd)
Subject: Re: update on Delivery failure notification ref. delete george
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 08:20:30
cc: iantdhq@ga*.ne*
In article <17BBD246811@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> Mail Delivery System
<postmaster@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> writes:
>From: Mail Delivery System <postmaster@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*>
>Date:    Tue, 19 Sep 95 9:28:19 +500
>Subject: Delivery failure notification

>With reference to your message with the subject:
>   "george"

>One or more addresses in your message have failed with the following
>responses from the mail transport system:

>   User <cavediverslistcavers@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> not known at this site.

>If this is a list operation (e.g. SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE), send 
>the commands HELP and LISTS to the maiser@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*.  You
>will receive a reply describing the Mail Server commands and list
>descriptions.  If the error message above advises you to contact 
>someone, please contact that person instead of the postmaster.  If 
>you have tried these things and need further assistance, please mail 
>postmaster@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*.  

>-------------------- Returned message follows ---------------------

>Return-path: <iantdhq@ga*.ne*>
>Received: from tequesta.gate.net by condor.circa.ufl.edu (Mercury 1.21);
>    19 Sep 95 09:28:11 +500
>Received: from miafl2-21.gate.net (miafl2-21.gate.net [199.227.2.149]) by
tequesta.gate.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA51469; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 To:
techdiver@terra.net
>From: iantdhq@ga*.ne* (iantd)
>Subject: george
>Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 09:42:08
>cc: cavediverslistcavers@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*
>Message-ID: <iantdhq.7.0009B414@ga*.ne*>

>In article   writes:
>On deleting George from tech diver---As a recipant of much of his stabs I 
>should be the one who is delighted.

>However this is a free country and George has the right to be on the list.
>How many of you remember the book 1984 and it's discussion of loss of 
>freedomsand rights. I for one vote, if a vote is allowed to reinstate George. 
>As much as I diagree with many things he says I do respect him and think 
>occassionaly the dialog he forces to be created is productive. Of course at 
>other times I would like to meet him in a dark alley. But how can we deny his 
>freedom of speach.

>Tom Mount




Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]