>The shift from "rules" of diving to "variables" of diving would allow >instructors to teach both the benefits *and* costs of the different >variables (including buddies) under different conditions (i.e., how >changes in one variable may affect the costs and benefits of another >variable). I doubt this philosophy would ever be adopted by the >agencies, but I think it would work. Sorry Rich, I think we're in that ideal work that you and I love so much again, my turn to bring you back to reality... This move, while it would no doubt create divers much better prepared for the underwater world, it would remove the vast majority of people from the roles of potential divers. The vast majority of divers today do NOT think, regardless of what level they are trained to, this has been demonstrated to me time and time again , sometimes by you Rich. I DO think however, that, at some point in the "ladder" there should be a point at which you MUST learn how to think. A more complete course on decompression theory, equipment, etc along with some difficult problems could be worked up. This could could be TOTALLY a classroom exercise OR it could be combined with some type of water work. People at the "professional" level - i.e. DM/AI and up should take this. There should also be a point also at which divers themselves have to learn this. I think you'd have a LOT fewer "tech" divers this way though... -Carl-
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]