Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Is this the same George? I certainly prefer this demeanor. Now my question. You (IMHO, deservatively) slam Mount, et. al. for diving enriched air at 170 ft., etc. (PPO2 = 1.4atm, certainly makes sense to me) But where do we get "appropriate" limits for various mixes? The real question that I have concerns the max air depth. I.e., why 130 ft? Why not 100 ft or 150 ft? The PPO2 limit would be 190-200 ft. What is the basis of a lower limit? On a related subject, has anyone done experiments to attempt to measure the degree of Nitrogen Narcosis? For example, reaction time measurements in a chamber? It would be very interesting to see the shape of an imparement curve. At 9:42 PM 9/12/95, <giii01@in*.co*> wrote: > Gary, I guess you feel that attacking me is a >contribution to this list. Why don't you quit wasting >my time, and tell us all why diving deep on air, >diving nitrox at 170 feet, diving elevated PPO2s, >and all of the other strokery you feel so offended >by my questioning (you call it flaming) is such >a good idea. Not one of you has yet to put one shrncead >of information on here in support of something you all >so obviously treat like the Sermon on the Mount. If >you want to trade insulting messages, we can crank it >right back up again. If you want to talk safety, let's >hear it. Maybe I will go to IANDTD and take deep air >and then start diving nitrox at 170. Go ahead, >make your case. - George ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@da*.ne*
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]