>
> Someone wrote about glossy techdiver magazines:-
> > ... the font being used and the layout makes for difficult reading. Even
> > Aquacorps suffers from this problem, by trying to be innovative with the
> > graphical layout, they break too many rules, making reading it difficult.
>
> Barry Miller <millerb@fr*.sc*.fs*.ed*> replied:-
> > Pete, Is it the big words you have trouble with or just not enough pictures.
> > JUST KIDDING, BARRY
>
> There is no need to be silly. Everybody is `dyslexic' when faced with a very
> light(1) very compressed small type font over an ornamented background on
> highly glossy paper reflecting bright patches like a mirror from every light
> bulb and/or brightly lit window in the room. Why can't Aquacorps etc use
> ordinary scientific article type font on ordinary scientific article type
> paper? On such cheaper paper they could use larger bolder type and print the
> same text clearer for the same expense and sell it for the same cost.
> (1) Or whatever the opposite to `boldface' is, if there are any printers out
> there.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know what your name is since you did not sign your name, so
I just call you Shit-for-brains. As you can see I'm just a silly guy,
it was ment to bring a smile on Pete's face. Pete, I hope you took it
that way. With the tone that was on the list for a while I thought
that a little silliness might bring the tone down a little. Maybe the
pictures are OK, it could be that cord that runs from your rectum to
your eyes that gives you such a shitty outlook on life.
Silly Me,
BARRY
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]