> > Someone wrote about glossy techdiver magazines:- > > ... the font being used and the layout makes for difficult reading. Even > > Aquacorps suffers from this problem, by trying to be innovative with the > > graphical layout, they break too many rules, making reading it difficult. > > Barry Miller <millerb@fr*.sc*.fs*.ed*> replied:- > > Pete, Is it the big words you have trouble with or just not enough pictures. > > JUST KIDDING, BARRY > > There is no need to be silly. Everybody is `dyslexic' when faced with a very > light(1) very compressed small type font over an ornamented background on > highly glossy paper reflecting bright patches like a mirror from every light > bulb and/or brightly lit window in the room. Why can't Aquacorps etc use > ordinary scientific article type font on ordinary scientific article type > paper? On such cheaper paper they could use larger bolder type and print the > same text clearer for the same expense and sell it for the same cost. > (1) Or whatever the opposite to `boldface' is, if there are any printers out > there. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't know what your name is since you did not sign your name, so I just call you Shit-for-brains. As you can see I'm just a silly guy, it was ment to bring a smile on Pete's face. Pete, I hope you took it that way. With the tone that was on the list for a while I thought that a little silliness might bring the tone down a little. Maybe the pictures are OK, it could be that cord that runs from your rectum to your eyes that gives you such a shitty outlook on life. Silly Me, BARRY
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]