On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Richard Pyle wrote: > > maybe this allows the "liberal" (whoops) surface treatment of %cns. > > none-the-less decompression safety encourages us to try and keep ppO2 high. > > game theory? > > But I think the only reason you have a surface-interval credit on the %cns > is for calculating on a subsequent dive, which means that the relative > safety of being topside (and thus more "liberal") is moot....? > what i really meant was.... it is "liberal" because it allows for tox fall-off to happen--not that you could suddenly start doing the twitch while packing your gear in the parking lot.... em _____________________________________________________________.sig Eric Maiken email: eapg243@ea*.oa*.uc*.ed* Dept. of Physics o: 714 824-6621 U of California fax: 714 824 2175 Irvine, CA 92715-4575
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]