On Thu, 20 Jul 1995 16:51:07 -0500 you said: >>Rich uses examples of, say, putting a Y-valve on a tank and attaching two >>complete regulator systems to the valves. The complexity has doubled (two >>regulators) but he asserts that the chances of a life threatening emergency >>has decreased. > True. If one of the regs free-flows (or an O-ring fails), the single air >supply gets depleted real fast, whereas in an independant doubles, you have >a real enuinely true authentic reduntant air supply... :) At the risk of showing my ignorance here (have dealt with manifolds, but have never seen a Y-valve), doesn't the Y-valve have TWO valves downstream from the actual Y, rather than a single valve upstream from the Y? If the latter, I fail to see any benefit from a Y-valve other than possible regulator freeze in cold water; sounds more like doubling the risks of a free flow otherwise. Doesn't the Y-valve at least have some means of shutting off one side of the output (whether separate valves or a single isolator) ? Isn't that the intent? [\] Jeff Kell <jeff@ut*.ut*.ed*>
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]