Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:29:03 +22305714 (HST)
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
Subject: Re: O2 NARCOSIS
To: giii01@In*.Co*
Cc: techdiver@terra.net
>    Someone should mention that to get a good O2 buzz going
> in a chamber, you better have your restraints on - the
> convulsion would be a beauty.  - George

That's basicly why "O2 narcosis" is virtually a non-issue.  Concerns for
O2 toxicity come in at far lower PO2 exposures than when O2 narcosis
becomes a concern.  However, if you calculate your EAD based on nitrogen
alone, then you are not necessecarily calculating your narcosis correctly
if your O2:N2 ratio exceeds 1:4.  It only matters on nitrox below about
100 feet, or trimix other than "heliair"; and even then it doesn't matter
much because narcosis is such a variable thing due to other factors anyway.

Incidently, I did once breathe pure O2 at a simulated 220 feet (another
person's mistake).  No convulsions, but the narcosis was not unusually
different from my experience with air at 220 feet. Go figure.

Aloha,
Rich


Richard Pyle
deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*
*******************************************************************
"WHATEVER happens to you when you willingly go underwater is
COMPLETELY and ENTIRELY your own responsibility! If you cannot
accept this responsibility, stay out of the water!"
*******************************************************************

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]