Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Re: diving/flying
From: bmay@ci*.co* (Brad May)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1993 10:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Brad May wrote:
> 
> Devon E Bowen wrote:
> > 
> > Somebody (no attribution) wrote:
> > > 
> > > One item you wrote that interested me was the fact that you'd adjust 
> > > for the altitude. Exactly how would you do that?
> > 
> > What I was suggesting was adjusting the tables as you would for any
> > altitude dive. [Adjust for 8000' (cabin pressure)...]
> 
> In the example you give, you are diving at sea level.  By adjusting your 
> table for 8000' you are ignoring the fact that your tissues are already 
> saturated at a higher pressure of 1 ATA.  All you table calculations will 
> be off because this initial N2 load is not accounted for.
> 
> Now, if you dive for 24 hours (or whatever 3x the longest compartment 
> half-time in your particular table is) this initial error will have 
> dissipated away, and what you propose would be valid [...]

I take that back, after 24 hours of diving, diving on a table adjusted 
to 8000' feet *still* wouldn't be valid, because in doing your adjusted 
table calculations you assume that when you surface you are at 8000'.  
In reality you are still at sea level (1 ATA), so you are not offgassing 
as fast or as completely as your calculations say.  This will still be 
very conservative for intermediate dives, because you never really 
"surface" to 8000' between dives, you remain "submerged" at an equivalent 
depth of 

Ceiling_Depth = (1 ATA - p(8000')) * 33 FSW/1ATA.

Sorry, don't have a table here to know the equivalent pressure for 8000'.

But when your week of divng is over and it's time to board your plane and 
"surface" to 8000' equivalent cabin pressure, you must consider that you 
effectively haven't surfaced all week, but have in reality done a single 
week-long multilevel dive with a minimum effective depth as calculated 
above.  Your tissues (especially the longer compartments) are more 
saturated than your calculations assume.

I've never taken an altitude class, so take this with a grain of salt, 
but it makes sense to me.  Comments?

Brad May (bmay@co*.ci*.co*)

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]