Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: TechDiver@inset.com
Subject: Technical vs. Deep Diving
From: "JR Oldroyd" <jr@fu*.in*.co*>
Date: Mon Feb 15 17:52:06 EST 1993
More thoughts from me, these ones prompted by articles by John,
MSMAIL%"HeimannJ@WL* SCSD"%GTEC3.dnet@gt*.co* (that's not a REAL
email address, is it!?) and Maria, mdm@im*.cm*.lt*.de*.co*, and
also several people's introductory articles.

There seems to be an assumption within the diving community at large,
that "technical diving" == "very deep diving".  In advanced diving
circles, I do not believe that this is necessarily the case.

To me, Technical Diving implies simply, the use of technology to enhance
the diving experience.  Just that!

It is certainly true that through the use of technology, one is able to
safely extend the range of one's dives, both in terms of time, and
depth, but this should not be viewed as the sole goal of Technical
Diving. The use of an underwater communicator can, for example, enhance
the safety of a dive.  At a recent club meeting here, Captain Howard
Klein (who runs the dive boat The Eagle's Nest, in Long Island, NY) gave
a presentation.  Howard refers to his ship, not as a `dive boat', but as
a `surface support vessel'.  His dive masters, as well as any divers
that want to, get to use a communicator, such as the OTS buddy phones.
Not only does this give diver-diver contact, it also allows
diver-surface communication.  Now, imagine if you're diving and get
stuck in a crevice between two rocks on an ordinary dive at, say 25
meters down.  The implication of having the radio is that you can
announce "Help, I'm stuck in a crevice, after about 3 minutes swim north
from the boat, and I'm 25 meters down," and other divers, and the surface
support staff, will know when and where to start searching.  Without the
technology, you may be out of air and drowned, before anyone even thinks
to start looking for you.

Yes, we did kick this list off with a lot of discussion about NITROX and
TRIMIX, and these technologies are focused on extending dive times or
depths. However, I too, want to stress that NITROX and TRIMIX are there
primarily to enhance the SAFETY of such dives and that both technologies
are still relatively new.  You don't just take a NITROX course, then
fill your tanks and go do a 1-hour dive to 30 meters.  And, don't expect
to take a TRIMIX course, get a fill, then dive straight down to 80
meters for a bit.

As John said, it is important if you plan to dive deep, to do it in
phases. Even if you have a TRIMIX certificate, and just did a
qualification dive to 70 meters, it is wise to then take a few steps
back and get comfortable with what you learned, but in less demanding
conditions. During your TRIMIX class, you probably used stage bottles
for the first time.  So that's at least three new things: stage bottles,
extended depth, and a new gas.  So, after the class, go back to diving
to 20 meters, use air, and just practice with handling stage bottles.
Only when you are TOTALLY COMFORTABLE with that, should you move back a
bit deeper.

To follow up on Maria's comment, technical divers should always remember
why the recreational dive limits are there: SAFETY.  When you apply
technical concepts to any dive, you should do so in a manner that
enhances the safety of that dive.  And, this can only be done through a
thorough understanding of that technology, together with gradual and
increasing experience in its use.

	-jr

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]