Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
JT, What does any of this have to do with the original question of how many technical, sub 150', helium based decompression dives you have done? You present yourself as an expert and diving professional. Substantiate your credentials to the list. Simply validate the 43 dives or contest them with another number. Tell us the truth. While you are at it, when were you mix certified? By whom and by what agency? If you have a card, which I doubt, I'd bet you got it courtesy of Kinkos. Tell us the truth. JT, you are a just a loud mouthed punk trying to make yourself important by bullying newbies and "exposing" others. This time you have been exposed. You have lied by implying the number of your dives is far greater than they actually are. I don't think you have a mix certification. I think that if you took your 43 dives and subtracted the NDEs, CFs, constant multiple mishaps and "confessions" you probably have a negative number of dives to your credit. Now you attempt to blackmail Mike B. with your fake artifact crap, threaten to call employers and attempt to intimidate Mike R. with your "I won't post if you won't post BS". School boy crap that only a real POS would pull. You are a stain on societies underwear. So, lets see if you can answer the question. How many sub 150 fsw, helium back gas decompression dives have you done? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Capt JT" <captjt@mi*.co*> To: "Mike Rodriguez" <mikey@ma*.ne*> Cc: <aocfishman@ho*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 7:12 PM Subject: Re: Vitric > Mike R..... > Trust me, I believe you are telling the truth and making it right after the > fact is not the point. You also did not recover any artifacts, you really > could care less about them I believe. Now the problem I had, Mike B has > admitted to only telling me on the way out that the wreck was possibly > protected . I did not recover anything and was offered a fecsel lens by > Barnette during the dive and I refused. > > The problem is he knew that the possibility existed that this wreck was > protected and chose to still remove artifacts first and check the LAW > later. The photos I have clearly show it was premeditated theft and I was > asked to remain silent. I was sent these photos from another who was on the > dive and had video of it, he named the photos and sent us all copies by > email. While directing me I could not place the ones showing the recovery > of the artifacts on my site. He has his copyright on them. > Really I could care less, the artifacts will just rot down there, really to > deep for very many to see. But I do enjoy showing everyone the true nature > of Mike Barnette. I cannot believe you guys are stupid enough to keep > letting this come out, cause if I did not have the proof and a witness at > the dock I could very well be sued. But I have the photos, I have the > witness. But Mike Barnette is not smart enough to say "No Comment" and then > it becomes an issue I must pursue if I want anything really done to him. To > tell the truth I could care less, I like fucking with him because he is a > dumbass. Now I have answered this as fast I can, if you do not approve your > post I will not this one......Mike R. stay out of this, if I see yours gets > posted I will post this one. > > > At 06:09 PM 4/8/03 -0400, Mike Rodriguez wrote: > >At 03:48 PM 4/7/2003 -0400, you wrote: > > > > > > > you removing artifacts from the Vitric when you thought it was protected, > > > >JT, > > > >At the time we did those dives it was expressly stated by the captain > >of the boat and it was believed by our entire group that the lower > >boundary of the protected area was 300 FSW. The Vitric lies along > >a deeper contour, and as far as we knew at the time, outside the > >protected area. > > > >When the error was discovered, we immediately informed the proper > >authorities who, in fact, also erroneously told us that the lower > >boundary was at 300 FSW. Eventually, and due to our diligence, > >the actual boundaries were determined to include the Vitric, and our > >group cooperated completely with the authorities. All of this has > >been formally documented and is a matter of public record. Why do > >you refuse to accept this? > > > >Another neophyte... > > > >-Mike Rodriguez > ><mikey@mi*.ne*> > >http://www.mikey.net/scuba.html > >Pn(x) = (1/(2^n)n!)[d/dx]^n(x^2 - 1)^n > > > "You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in the > water" > Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more > Web Site http://www.capt-jt.com/ > Email captjt@mi*.co* > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]