Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C2FCBE.136272C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe, you know better than that. Darwin Award nominations can only be = made posthumously, because it is impossible to tell whether the nominee = really has what it takes to win the award if he hasn't offed himself = yet. The most you can do about Capt JT right now is mention his name to the = committee as someone they should keep an eye on. I agree that he shows = considerable promise as a potential nominee. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: joe@po*.co*=20 To: techdiver@aquanaut.com=20 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 7:29 PM Subject: Re: Fatal Depth - JT nominated for award >Now I hear some rumors about a 50-minute dive on the Ostfriesland, = >complete with a deco habitat, just so you can say you did a longer dive = >than JJ did at depth on the Britannic. Awesome stuff there JT! Are you = >going to do the extended dive so you can try and determine what=20 > really sunk the Ostfriesland?? I hereby nominate JT for a Darwin Award. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Michael Barnette" <aocfishman@ho*.co*> To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 8:27 PM Subject: RE: Fatal Depth > Hi JT- >=20 > >Mike as usual you are full of shit. You are right about the year = with DQ,=20 > >but that is it. I have for your benefit added a couple of photos to = my=20 > >site, they have the Lobster in question and the date on the photo = along=20 > >with the guy who got it......not me. >=20 > Man, the truth changes again. Blame it on someone else. At the = time you=20 > were boasting it was *your* lobster. I did not see any other person = with=20 > you from your charter that day in the parking lot. For fuck sake, I = need a=20 > program to keep up with all your "edits" and digressions. BTW, is = it legal=20 > or illegal to spear lobsters? As a USCG certified captain (and I = use that=20 > term lightly when referring to you) running dive charters you should = know=20 > that answer. Instead of answering the question, go ahead and turn = it back=20 > on me about the artifacts (yes, you are that predictable). >=20 > >Now as for me and my boat..... when you call see if he has the = balls to=20 > >admit he asked me to run for his shop when it first opened and = Dusty asked=20 > >me to Capt his boat before he stopped booking through there. >=20 > JT, this has nothing to do with anything. It still was a POS = 6-pack. >=20 > >Then ask about the last time I came in there and I caught him = saying=20 > >bullshit that was not true about an accident on the Miss Lindsey = and he did=20 > >not know I was on the boat when it happened and I confronted him to = his=20 > >face over it. I have my witnesses who were there when this = happened. >=20 > Wasn't there and it has nothing to do with my original post. Keep = to the=20 > program please. I was in the parking lot. I saw the speared = lobster (which=20 > at the time you said was yours). I saw you come in several times = into the=20 > shop and wouldn't stay away from the fill station and yapping about = the "JT=20 > show." It was funny when you would come in as everyone would = scatter like=20 > someone just farted. Then I would realize it was just you. I = helped put up=20 > the "JT chain." I noticed you didn't come in anymore after we = called you a=20 > moron. What happened to me not knowing how to fill your doubles? = Give it a=20 > rest jackass. >=20 > >Get your dive buddy who sent me the photos of you guys removing = artifacts=20 > >off the Vitric when you thought it was a protected wreck, have him = give me=20 > >permission to place them on my site since he has his copy right = mark on=20 > >them and everyone will see the real you or are you the pussy I say = you are=20 > >and won't do it. I will not altar them or change them.......the = title he=20 > >put on them says it all. Just have him give me permission is all I = need. >=20 > JT, again here we go on another predictable bug hunt. Yeah, I guess = this=20 > was the time I threatened you to keep your mouth shut, as you stated = in=20 > another post, right? More JT bullshit. Speaking of that dive, what = did you=20 > tell me in regard to my trip report -- something like "you were real = nice"=20 > about what happened to you on that dive? Like when you ignored our = advice=20 > not to take your POS scooter past its depth rating on that wreck. = What=20 > happened? It flooded, resulting in you and one other diver adding a = bunch=20 > of gas to recover that POS. Your arrogance and ignorance could have = led to=20 > a bad situation. Again, you just don't get it, instead playing it = off that=20 > the scooter was "expendable." I guess you feel the same way about = your=20 > fellow divers. Or when you lost your knife, or when your light = screwed up,=20 > or you holding on to the line for dear life as you had no buoyancy = skills,=20 > or when you soaked in the water all day long as you had (and have) = no clue=20 > about decompression (sure, it was the low O2)? Jesus, you were a=20 > clusterfuck. That's what we should really be discussing, and what a = lot of=20 > people asked you nicely about. Such as how many dives you have = done, how=20 > many trimix dives did you do before doing something like the = Ostfriesland=20 > and Frankfurt, etc. (ect. ect)? >=20 > I think everyone is getting tired of your "truths" [e.g., JT's = "truth" on=20 > your 2001 Doria dives: "I spent most of the day in my bunk = recovering from=20 > a taskful dive" and "I also remained in seclusion on this trip, not = happy=20 > with my actions and not happy with the actions of one of my crew on = a=20 > personal note , we did not speak to each other unless we had to, = more stress=20 > for me. I was not having a good time." The **real truth**: you = were bent=20 > and on O2 in your bunk.]. >=20 > But getting back to your post. Again all lies (I apologize as I = understand=20 > that saying "your posts" and then "lies" is a bit redundant). We = never=20 > thought it was protected, so just quit lying about that. Why don't = you=20 > relate the actual and truthful conversation that went on during the = boat=20 > ride out, when everyone asked if it was or wasn't protected? What = did I say=20 > about the 300fsw contour? Jesus JT, you are an intellectual nitwit. = If you=20 > had such a problem, and think we truly had premeditated anything = illegal,=20 > why didn't you say anything at the time? Check with those in the = know, and=20 > you will see that the right thing was done once it was realized a = mistake=20 > was made (it was all documented). At the time, *even they* thought = it was=20 > not protected and outside of the boundaries. I think I have told = you this=20 > in the past, but you refuse to accept it. >=20 > So, I think that covers all the bases, you want to bring up the = accident or=20 > supposed "cover-up" now, or will you ever answer any of the simple = and=20 > direct questions asked of you by numerous people on the list? >=20 > Again, you calling anyone a neophyte is a joke. Just because you = *survived*=20 > a 400-foot dive does not make you a good diver. Do you get that? =20 > Apparently not. Now I hear some rumors about a 50-minute dive on = the=20 > Ostfriesland, complete with a deco habitat, just so you can say you = did a=20 > longer dive than JJ did at depth on the Britannic. Awesome stuff = there JT! =20 > Are you going to do the extended dive so you can try and determine = what=20 > really sunk the Ostfriesland?? I really hope that is just an April = Fool's=20 > joke. Besides, you still have to come back to Florida to dive on = that=20 > 470fsw U-boat of yours (you know, the "sub" off Boynton). I can't = wait for=20 > you to see what it really is. >=20 > You have not done anything of note (not implying that I have, so = don't get=20 > your panties in a wad. Remember, I am a neophyte). All your = boasting is a=20 > tad funny, considering you are simply following in other's = footsteps. All=20 > the dives you have done were several years after initial exploration = by=20 > other trailblazers, but with the HUGE difference that you have the = access to=20 > proper gasses, information about decompression, etc. (ect., ect.). = But, all=20 > you can do is try and take cheap shots at them while you try = desperately to=20 > make a name for yourself. In any case, with all this information, = better=20 > tables, etc. (ect., ect.), it *should* be easier for you JT, don't = you get=20 > that? You are nothing but an illiterate hack that has yet to = explore=20 > anything new. Whoops, almost forgot that fishing vessel of yours. = Bravo! >=20 > I think I have fairly answered most of your claims. Yet, you = predictably=20 > fail to answer one simple and direct question posed to you from = multiple=20 > posters on this list. Instead, you always find a segue or try and = "expose"=20 > someone so as to take the embarrassing spotlight off you. This is = not going=20 > to go away. >=20 > 1. How many technical dives have you done? Please exclude the = air/air BS=20 > (such as when you almost became the second fatality on the Ocean = Venture on=20 > that one trip back in '96 or '97). Just to give a clear = delineation, let's=20 > just include all helium-based dives below 150fsw. I really don't = care about=20 > max depth or other silliness; let's just focus on proficiency. Why = don't=20 > you break it down by year also? Thanks buddy. >=20 > I won't hold my breath, as I don't think you will ever answer this = question.=20 > But, as you stated, anyone can go onto your website to quickly add = up all=20 > those technical dives of yours. I think I didn't have to use = anything more=20 > than my two hands and two feet to cover most of them, definitely not = more=20 > than my two hands for any one year. Just to give you a benchmark, = so you=20 > might someday get a clue, Billy Deans accumulated 438 dives on the = Wilkes=20 > Barre alone. That's just one wreck. Even if you cut that in half, = or even=20 > take 25% of that, you fall so far short of that it is preposterous = for you=20 > to call anyone a neophyte. >=20 > Your infatuation with depth and time is going to get you, or more=20 > importantly, someone else that doesn't know any better, killed. = Most people=20 > that are doing 400-500fsw+ dives these days don't do a lot of = advertising or=20 > boasting (there is a fair bit of deep stuff going on, here and = abroad, in=20 > case you didn't know) as they realize that it is not something you = want to=20 > encourage new divers to quickly pursue. For fuck's sake, even your = fellow=20 > VBTECH boys are trying to get that point across to you. >=20 > So, go ahead and cry me a river. Scream to the heavens that I am = lying. Go=20 > ahead and call me whatever nifty redneck insult you can. Go ahead = and try=20 > to post more of your "truths" to expose me. Go ahead and digress,=20 > embellish, stupefy, and outright lie to avoid coming to the = realization that=20 > you yourself, are nothing more than a neophyte. >=20 > Oh, and be sure to have a r-e-a-l swell day. > Happy Birthday Jackass! >=20 > Your friend for life, > Mike >=20 >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* =20 > http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/junkmail >=20 >=20 > ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C2FCBE.136272C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Joe, you know better than that. = Darwin Award=20 nominations can only be made posthumously, because it is impossible = to tell=20 whether the nominee really has what it takes to win the award if he = hasn't offed=20 himself yet.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The most you can do about Capt JT right = now is=20 mention his name to the committee as someone they should keep an eye = on. I=20 agree that he shows considerable promise as a potential = nominee.</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Djoe@po*.co*=20 href=3D"mailto:joe@po*.co*">joe@polarbearinc.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dtechdiver@aquanaut.com=20 href=3D"mailto:techdiver@aquanaut.com">techdiver@aquanaut.com</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 06, 2003 = 7:29=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Fatal Depth - JT = nominated=20 for award</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>>Now I hear some rumors about a = 50-minute dive=20 on the Ostfriesland, >complete with a deco habitat, just so = you can=20 say you did a longer dive >than JJ did at depth on the=20 Britannic. Awesome stuff there JT! Are you >going to do = the=20 extended dive so you can try and determine what <BR>> really sunk = the=20 Ostfriesland??</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT size=3D3>I hereby nominate JT = for a Darwin=20 Award.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From: "Michael Barnette" = <</FONT><A=20 href=3D"mailto:aocfishman@ho*.co*"><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>aocfishman@ho*.co*</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>To: <</FONT><A=20 href=3D"mailto:techdiver@aquanaut.com"><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>techdiver@aquanaut.com</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 8:27 = PM</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Subject: RE: Fatal = Depth</FONT></DIV></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR><FONT size=3D2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT = face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>> Hi JT-<BR>> <BR>> >Mike as usual you are full = of shit.=20 You are right about the year with DQ, <BR>> >but that is it. I = have for=20 your benefit added a couple of photos to my <BR>> >site, they = have the=20 Lobster in question and the date on the photo along <BR>> >with = the guy=20 who got it......not me.<BR>> <BR>> Man, the truth changes = again. =20 Blame it on someone else. At the time you <BR>> were boasting = it was=20 *your* lobster. I did not see any other person with <BR>> you = from=20 your charter that day in the parking lot. For fuck sake, I need = a=20 <BR>> program to keep up with all your "edits" and = digressions. BTW,=20 is it legal <BR>> or illegal to spear lobsters? As a USCG = certified=20 captain (and I use that <BR>> term lightly when referring to you) = running=20 dive charters you should know <BR>> that answer. Instead of = answering=20 the question, go ahead and turn it back <BR>> on me about the = artifacts=20 (yes, you are that predictable).<BR>> <BR>> >Now as for me = and my=20 boat..... when you call see if he has the balls to <BR>> >admit = he asked=20 me to run for his shop when it first opened and Dusty asked = <BR>>=20 >me to Capt his boat before he stopped booking through = there.<BR>>=20 <BR>> JT, this has nothing to do with anything. It still was = a POS=20 6-pack.<BR>> <BR>> >Then ask about the last time I came in = there and=20 I caught him saying <BR>> >bullshit that was not true about an = accident=20 on the Miss Lindsey and he did <BR>> >not know I was on the boat = when it=20 happened and I confronted him to his <BR>> >face over it. I have = my=20 witnesses who were there when this happened.<BR>> <BR>> Wasn't = there and=20 it has nothing to do with my original post. Keep to the <BR>> = program=20 please. I was in the parking lot. I saw the speared = lobster (which=20 <BR>> at the time you said was yours). I saw you come in = several=20 times into the <BR>> shop and wouldn't stay away from the fill = station and=20 yapping about the "JT <BR>> show." It was funny when you = would come=20 in as everyone would scatter like <BR>> someone just farted. = Then I=20 would realize it was just you. I helped put up <BR>> the "JT=20 chain." I noticed you didn't come in anymore after we called you = a=20 <BR>> moron. What happened to me not knowing how to fill your = doubles? Give it a <BR>> rest jackass.<BR>> <BR>> = >Get your=20 dive buddy who sent me the photos of you guys removing artifacts = <BR>>=20 >off the Vitric when you thought it was a protected wreck, have him = give me=20 <BR>> >permission to place them on my site since he has his copy = right=20 mark on <BR>> >them and everyone will see the real you or are = you the=20 pussy I say you are <BR>> >and won't do it. I will not altar = them or=20 change them.......the title he <BR>> >put on them says it all. = Just have=20 him give me permission is all I need.<BR>> <BR>> JT, again here = we go on=20 another predictable bug hunt. Yeah, I guess this <BR>> was = the time I=20 threatened you to keep your mouth shut, as you stated in <BR>> = another=20 post, right? More JT bullshit. Speaking of that dive, what = did you=20 <BR>> tell me in regard to my trip report -- something like "you = were real=20 nice" <BR>> about what happened to you on that dive? Like = when you=20 ignored our advice <BR>> not to take your POS scooter past its = depth rating=20 on that wreck. What <BR>> happened? It flooded, = resulting in=20 you and one other diver adding a bunch <BR>> of gas to recover that = POS. Your arrogance and ignorance could have led to <BR>> a = bad=20 situation. Again, you just don't get it, instead playing it off = that=20 <BR>> the scooter was "expendable." I guess you feel the same = way=20 about your <BR>> fellow divers. Or when you lost your knife, = or when=20 your light screwed up, <BR>> or you holding on to the line for dear = life as=20 you had no buoyancy skills, <BR>> or when you soaked in the water = all day=20 long as you had (and have) no clue <BR>> about decompression (sure, = it was=20 the low O2)? Jesus, you were a <BR>> clusterfuck. = That's what=20 we should really be discussing, and what a lot of <BR>> people = asked you=20 nicely about. Such as how many dives you have done, how <BR>> = many=20 trimix dives did you do before doing something like the Ostfriesland = <BR>>=20 and Frankfurt, etc. (ect. ect)?<BR>> <BR>> I think everyone is = getting=20 tired of your "truths" [e.g., JT's "truth" on <BR>> your 2001 Doria = dives: "I spent most of the day in my bunk recovering from = <BR>> a=20 taskful dive" and "I also remained in seclusion on this trip, not = happy=20 <BR>> with my actions and not happy with the actions of one of my = crew on a=20 <BR>> personal note , we did not speak to each other unless we had = to, more=20 stress <BR>> for me. I was not having a good time." The = **real=20 truth**: you were bent <BR>> and on O2 in your = bunk.].<BR>>=20 <BR>> But getting back to your post. Again all lies (I = apologize as I=20 understand <BR>> that saying "your posts" and then "lies" is a bit=20 redundant). We never <BR>> thought it was protected, so just = quit=20 lying about that. Why don't you <BR>> relate the actual and = truthful=20 conversation that went on during the boat <BR>> ride out, when = everyone=20 asked if it was or wasn't protected? What did I say <BR>> = about the=20 300fsw contour? Jesus JT, you are an intellectual nitwit. = If you=20 <BR>> had such a problem, and think we truly had premeditated = anything=20 illegal, <BR>> why didn't you say anything at the time? Check = with=20 those in the know, and <BR>> you will see that the right thing was = done=20 once it was realized a mistake <BR>> was made (it was all=20 documented). At the time, *even they* thought it was <BR>> = not=20 protected and outside of the boundaries. I think I have told you = this=20 <BR>> in the past, but you refuse to accept it.<BR>> <BR>> = So, I=20 think that covers all the bases, you want to bring up the accident or = <BR>>=20 supposed "cover-up" now, or will you ever answer any of the simple and = <BR>> direct questions asked of you by numerous people on the = list?<BR>>=20 <BR>> Again, you calling anyone a neophyte is a joke. Just = because=20 you *survived* <BR>> a 400-foot dive does not make you a good = diver. =20 Do you get that? <BR>> Apparently not. Now I hear some = rumors=20 about a 50-minute dive on the <BR>> Ostfriesland, complete with a = deco=20 habitat, just so you can say you did a <BR>> longer dive than JJ = did at=20 depth on the Britannic. Awesome stuff there JT! <BR>> = Are you=20 going to do the extended dive so you can try and determine what = <BR>>=20 really sunk the Ostfriesland?? I really hope that is just an = April=20 Fool's <BR>> joke. Besides, you still have to come back to = Florida to=20 dive on that <BR>> 470fsw U-boat of yours (you know, the "sub" off=20 Boynton). I can't wait for <BR>> you to see what it really=20 is.<BR>> <BR>> You have not done anything of note (not implying = that I=20 have, so don't get <BR>> your panties in a wad. Remember, I = am a=20 neophyte). All your boasting is a <BR>> tad funny, = considering you=20 are simply following in other's footsteps. All <BR>> the = dives you=20 have done were several years after initial exploration by <BR>> = other=20 trailblazers, but with the HUGE difference that you have the access to = <BR>> proper gasses, information about decompression, etc. (ect.,=20 ect.). But, all <BR>> you can do is try and take cheap shots = at them=20 while you try desperately to <BR>> make a name for yourself. = In any=20 case, with all this information, better <BR>> tables, etc. (ect., = ect.), it=20 *should* be easier for you JT, don't you get <BR>> that? You = are=20 nothing but an illiterate hack that has yet to explore <BR>> = anything=20 new. Whoops, almost forgot that fishing vessel of yours. =20 Bravo!<BR>> <BR>> I think I have fairly answered most of your=20 claims. Yet, you predictably <BR>> fail to answer one simple = and=20 direct question posed to you from multiple <BR>> posters on this=20 list. Instead, you always find a segue or try and "expose" = <BR>>=20 someone so as to take the embarrassing spotlight off you. This = is not=20 going <BR>> to go away.<BR>> <BR>> 1. How many = technical dives=20 have you done? Please exclude the air/air BS <BR>> (such as = when you=20 almost became the second fatality on the Ocean Venture on <BR>> = that one=20 trip back in '96 or '97). Just to give a clear delineation, = let's=20 <BR>> just include all helium-based dives below 150fsw. I = really=20 don't care about <BR>> max depth or other silliness; let's just = focus on=20 proficiency. Why don't <BR>> you break it down by year = also? =20 Thanks buddy.<BR>> <BR>> I won't hold my breath, as I don't = think you=20 will ever answer this question. <BR>> But, as you stated, = anyone can=20 go onto your website to quickly add up all <BR>> those technical = dives of=20 yours. I think I didn't have to use anything more <BR>> than = my two=20 hands and two feet to cover most of them, definitely not more <BR>> = than my=20 two hands for any one year. Just to give you a benchmark, so you = <BR>> might someday get a clue, Billy Deans accumulated 438 dives = on the=20 Wilkes <BR>> Barre alone. That's just one wreck. Even = if you=20 cut that in half, or even <BR>> take 25% of that, you fall so far = short of=20 that it is preposterous for you <BR>> to call anyone a = neophyte.<BR>>=20 <BR>> Your infatuation with depth and time is going to get you, or = more=20 <BR>> importantly, someone else that doesn't know any better, = killed. =20 Most people <BR>> that are doing 400-500fsw+ dives these days don't = do a=20 lot of advertising or <BR>> boasting (there is a fair bit of deep = stuff=20 going on, here and abroad, in <BR>> case you didn't know) as they = realize=20 that it is not something you want to <BR>> encourage new divers to = quickly=20 pursue. For fuck's sake, even your fellow <BR>> VBTECH boys = are=20 trying to get that point across to you.<BR>> <BR>> So, go ahead = and cry=20 me a river. Scream to the heavens that I am lying. Go = <BR>>=20 ahead and call me whatever nifty redneck insult you can. Go = ahead and=20 try <BR>> to post more of your "truths" to expose me. Go = ahead and=20 digress, <BR>> embellish, stupefy, and outright lie to avoid coming = to the=20 realization that <BR>> you yourself, are nothing more than a=20 neophyte.<BR>> <BR>> Oh, and be sure to have a r-e-a-l swell=20 day.<BR>> Happy Birthday Jackass!<BR>> <BR>> Your friend for=20 life,<BR>> Mike<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>=20 = _________________________________________________________________<BR>>= STOP=20 MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* <BR>> = </FONT><A=20 href=3D"http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/junkmail"><FONT = face=3DArial=20 = size=3D2>http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/junkmail</FONT></A><BR>&l t;FON= T=20 face=3DArial size=3D2>> <BR>> <BR>> = </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C2FCBE.136272C0-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]