Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Re: New Standard
From: <DiveInAq@ao*.co*>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:37:09 -0400
On Tuesday Tue, Apr 18, 1995 10:26 PM Richard Pyle wrote:

> If they don't they're opening up themselves to a major liability suit down
> the line.  I suspect the freedom from liability will more than offset the
> occasional lost student.  Besides, what instructor would WANT to take on a
> student who was unwilling to accept full responsibility for him or her
self?

Hi Richard - Here's my two cents:

I think you're engaging in wishful thinking if you believe that if the
student signed
such an agreement, it would always hold up in court.

The premise of a professional relationship between student and instructor is
that
the instructor is providing *something* in consideration for payment.  If
this
*something* is either directly or indirectly (either by deficit or gross
negligence) 
the source of a diver being injured or killed - you'll likely be held liable.

If you think that a strongly worded disclaimer is going to provide an
instructor
"freedom from liability"; then you and I will can both enjoy a small wager on
the
first suit stemming from an instructor sticking a O2 regulator into his
students
mouth at 200 ft.

Of course I'll want a student who'll accept ultimate responsibility for his
actions and
acts of nature that are beyond my control.  To grant myself an absolution
from liability is a bit foolhardy.

Great discussion, BTW!

- Keith

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]