Well, given the size of the sample population, it is likely a useless statistic. For example, what do you think of this: "I think everyone should dive the Edmund Fitzgerald. She sits under 529' of ice cold water and is extremely safe to dive since it has a 0% mortality rate." Only one person has dived the wreck, and it was a "successful" dive. Most wrecks don't get enough divers to collect accurate data as the Fitz example illustrates. ss On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Glen Hunt wrote: > > >In my opinion, a good focal point for Andrea Doria deaths. > > Out of curiosity, which wrecks have the highest mortality rate for divers? > > Glen > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]