Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:03:01 +0300
From: "Manos Manoli" <cytech@ma*.co*.cy*>
To: LB <lardi@wo*.dk*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Nazi's
 >>> There is no "belief", no "faith", no "pope", just simple facts. <<
TRUE
 >>> Why is it that no one ever says "you know, I've tried this DIR 
thing and it just sucks <<
AGAIN TRUE
 >>> The reason is that it all makes so much sense, it's hard not to 
just scream "Are you a moron for not getting this?  It's as obvious as 
the nose on your face <<<

The people usualy make the mistake , they think that is all about 
equipment , they dont understant that  DIR is all
about the correct processing bettween the ears.
But then again the bigest problem , and  the loughter voice agains DIR 
comes from the people who make money out of the
strokes.

Manos
www.smiley.cy.net/cytech

LB wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> I think most people will get the principles of DIR and see the 
> benefits I must admit that I'm not DIR but I do use quite a few of the 
> ideas.
>
> The BIGGEST hurdle DIR faces is the attitude !!  yep ! flame me all 
> you want !
>
>
>
>
> I have no problem with DIR. It's the fan clubs I don't get along with 
> !!   (slightly rewritten quote)
>
>
>
>
> RGDS
> And safe diving to all
> Stroke or DIR alike
>
> Lars Bjaerris
>
>
> On onsdag, september 25, 2002, at 08:54  PM, Paul Braunbehrens wrote:
>
>> Gene, the number of dives you have has nothing to do with it, as 
>> you've shown.  You get it, and people with many more dives just don't 
>> get it.
>>
>> All the flak that DIR/GUE have been getting has been largely based on 
>> the delivery, and on the attitude of those who have figured it out.  
>> It's really hard not to have that attitude, but we all try.  The 
>> reason is that it all makes so much sense, it's hard not to just 
>> scream "Are you a moron for not getting this?  It's as obvious as the 
>> nose on your face"
>>
>> As a result, we often hear the term DIReligion thrown around.  This 
>> is downright funny.  As you point out, religion means accepting 
>> something without proof.  Hence the words "belief, faith, etc.".  In 
>> fact, asking for proof is heresy, in most religions.  In diving 
>> however, the DIR system has proven itself over and over.  There is no 
>> "belief", no "faith", no "pope", just simple facts.
>>
>> All this talk of sucking up, of wanna bees, of religion, all this 
>> name calling is just bullshit in the end.  What counts is how well 
>> the system works when you are diving.  So here is my challenge.  All 
>> of you who keep shooting down this system why don't you try it?  
>> Almost everyone who dives DIR used to dive the PADI, TDI etc. way.  
>> We have tried both.  Why is it that no one ever says "you know, I've 
>> tried this DIR thing and it just sucks.  I'm going back to deep air, 
>> stab jacket, steel stages on both sides, a wetsuit and ankle 
>> weights."  The reason is that diving DIR is easier, safer, more fun, 
>> and much more elegant.
>
>
> -- 
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]