--part1_49.210f7f7d.2a73ff42_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_49.210f7f7d.2a73ff42_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <Brwswe@ao*.co*> From: Brwswe@ao*.co* Full-name: Brwswe Message-ID: <190.a6949be.2a72b389@ao*.co*> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:15:37 EDT Subject: Fwd: Deeps Stops And Haldane To: deco@de*.or* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_49.210f7f7d.2a72b389_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10567 --part2_49.210f7f7d.2a72b389_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part2_49.210f7f7d.2a72b389_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <Brwswe@ao*.co*> From: Brwswe@ao*.co* Full-name: Brwswe Message-ID: <8d.1bac0726.2a72b32f@ao*.co*> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:14:07 EDT Subject: Deeps Stops And Haldane To: eco@de*.or*, tneuman@uc*.ed*, ryn@dc*.dn*.ca*, sheffp@hy*.co* (Paul J. Sheffield Ph. D. (E-mail), pbennett@da*.du*.ed* (Bennett,Peter), dorr@da*.du*.ed* (Orr,Dan), v.flook@ab*.ac*.uk*, Beyerstein@ao*.co*, rvann@da*.du*.ed* (Vann,Richard), jlivingstone@na*.or*, jbram@na*.or*, p.oliver@na*.or*, ANDIHQ@ao*.co*, Oxygenengr@ao*.co*, PSAuerbach@ao*.co*, rwhamilton@co*.co*, Evincotter@cs*.co*, cborne@ea*.ne*, walt.jaap@fw*.st*.fl*.us*, bturbo@ga*.ne*, dick@hy*.co*, mwells@in*.ne*, pdenoble@da*.du*.ed* (Denoble,Petar), alexakos@gu*.co*, trey@ne*.co*, iantdhq@ix*.ne*.co*, moon0002@mc*.du*.ed* (Moon,Richard), emmerman@nb*.co*, dave.dinsmore@no*.go*, boliver@sc*.co*, brianc@td*.co*, gegstrom@uc*.ed*, kvanhoesen@uc*.ed*, Brylske@ao*.co* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part3_49.210f7f7d.2a72b32f_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10567 --part3_49.210f7f7d.2a72b32f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Peter, Good to hear from you -- was hoping you would reply. A couple of points here for everybody:. 1) -- in the ADM article on Deep Stops, we CLEARLY acknowledge that Haldane "tested deep stops FIRST". But it NEVER went any further His computational machinery doesn't allow it either. (BTW, that article was first sent to you for publication in ALERT DIVER at the request of Earnest Campbell, MD, so you can certainly verify what I said here) 2) -- The tech community really pioneered, tested, and made deep stops work. Hills might have done it, but he blew it with his Oceaneering tests with you guys at Duke -- his dropout at 20 fsw probably missed the short tail of the deco curve (I believe). Many also believe that slammed the door on deep stops until the tech community picked back up on it. Deep stops today do not blow that tail away -- nor do the models. 3) -- Your recent studies, along with Marroni, Brubakk, and Cope seem to be (re) affirming deep stop technology. Thanks mucho for that. Please accept my formal invitation to re-present that at the Deep Stops And Modern Deco Stategies Workshop in February in Tampa. And we certainly want Richard to talk too -- I will connect with him when I get back 4) -- tech diving is a deadly serious business for me and my "tech friends" I have a bunch more to add -- but later. It's always a pleasure to talk to you. My best regards, BW --part3_49.210f7f7d.2a72b32f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2> <BR> Dear Peter, <BR> <BR> Good to hear from you -- was hoping you would reply. <BR> <BR> A couple of points here for everybody:. <BR> <BR> 1) -- in the ADM article on Deep Stops, we CLEARLY acknowledge that <BR> Haldane "tested deep stops FIRST". But it NEVER went any further <BR> His computational machinery doesn't allow it either. (BTW, that article <BR> was first sent to you for publication in ALERT DIVER at the request <BR> of Earnest Campbell, MD, so you can certainly verify what I said here) <BR> <BR> 2) -- The tech community really pioneered, tested, and made deep stops <BR> work. Hills might have done it, but he blew it with his Oceaneering <BR> tests with you guys at Duke -- his dropout at 20 fsw probably missed <BR> the short tail of the deco curve (I believe). Many also believe that slammed <BR> the door on deep stops until the tech community picked back up on it. <BR> Deep stops today do not blow that tail away -- nor do the models. <BR> <BR> 3) -- Your recent studies, along with Marroni, Brubakk, and Cope seem <BR> to be (re) affirming deep stop technology. Thanks mucho for that. <BR> Please accept my formal invitation to re-present that at the <BR> Deep Stops And Modern Deco Stategies Workshop in February <BR> in Tampa. And we certainly want Richard to talk too -- I will <BR> connect with him when I get back <BR> <BR> 4) -- tech diving is a deadly serious business for me and my "tech friends" <BR> <BR> I have a bunch more to add -- but later. <BR> <BR> It's always a pleasure to talk to you. My best regards, <BR> <BR> BW <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </FONT></HTML> --part3_49.210f7f7d.2a72b32f_boundary-- --part2_49.210f7f7d.2a72b389_boundary-- --part1_49.210f7f7d.2a73ff42_boundary-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]