>From: "Doug Chapman" <dougch@ea*.ne*> >To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >Subject: RE: Survey of NE DiveBoats re: GUE acceptance. >Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:52:28 -0400 > > >> Billy had some stroke things going on, like the bondage wings ( he was >an > >> OMS dealer), but what a good guy to dive with. > > >What is DIR's Number one rule? NEVER DIVE WITH STROKES. Yet you just >admit doing just that. > >He had stroke gear. Bungeed wings. > >By today's DIR definition Billy may be a "stroke" because of his then >choice of equipment. So what! 'But I'd rather dive with Billy and his >"stroke" OMS wing rather than risk diving with the idiots who have all the >DIR gear but lack the skill and intellect to safely use it. > So when applying Rule One, exactly what definition of "stroke" should be used? Don't dive with anyone who isn't 100% DIR in their kit, training, attitude, and every other way; or just don't dive with anyone who you think will put you at risk when you're down there? _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]