on 20/7/02 7:40 AM, a7a32310@te*.ne* at a7a32310@te*.ne* wrote: > Striving to shorten decompression > times - what is wrong with this? Shorter decompressions mean less time in the > water, where conditions are unpredictable, less opportunity for hypothermia, > easier gas planning, and less physiological damage since the decompression > effectiveness is increased. Sean I think it's important to mention that it seems from discussions that the goal was not 'shorter' deco per se but 'cleaner' and more optimal deco. In most cases decreased time was a 'side effect' of doing the right deco. Which is not to say that it's more desirable to be in the water for 8 hours than 20, but it's important to stress that it's got nothing to do with 'shaving deco'. Safe Diving dean laffan real world productions melbourne, australia ph +613-9419-3966 Mobile 0418-525-315 -- Sometimes we are lucky enough to know that our lives have been changed, to discard the old, embrace the new and run headlong down an immutable course. It happened to me when my eyes were opened to the sea. - Jacques-Yves Cousteau -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]