Christ, what rock have you been hiding under, Joe? That thread raged 
on for a couple of weeks. The incident was dissected to the nth 
degree. And the fact that it was Becky is hardly top secret, unless 
you have a rock.

To put it in a nutshell what was learned by everybody on the list 
(except you, apprently) is that if you need to re-read the section on 
pre-tox symptoms and be watchful for them when you are at high PP02's. 
You feel them, you go to back gas, fast . You don't you're gonna tox, 
even if you don't "deserve" it.

Of course an old salt like you already knows that, but one thing that 
you and Barnett keep forgetting is that there are bunch of newbies on 
these list swho are looking for information. You guy's attitude seems 
to be "fuck you, all we do is dive."

Thats bullshit of course, because you guys don't just dive, you also 
post shit all the time, too. And Barnett is usually the first person 
to do posts about other people's misfortunes except when it happens to 
his tidy little group.

If all you AUE guys do is dive then just dive and shut the fuck up. 
Stop doing your blow-my-horn "we dove on virgin wreck at 300' feet for 
40 min.s and picked portholes laying all over the sand"  shit. It is 
worthless, and it is boring. You guys sound like a broken record, no 
useful information, no facts, just glossy BS.

    Jim

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:24:09 -0800
    "Joe" <joe@po*.co*> wrote:
>>>I will not disclose the divers name as that is not their wish, for 
>>those
>>>that know who it was, please respect that wish.
>
>Capt JT   Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:58 PM 
>>>determined that Becky had..........Jim Cobb    February 21, 2002 6:12 
>>>PM
>
>So much for respecting her medical privacy.  Perhaps that plus 
>nonsensical rants from people who don't dive is the reason so many 
>have no interest in posting to this forum.
>
>So now I would like to know what lessons were learned from the thread 
>about Becky's seizure?  Do you know what caused it?  Did she do 
>anything wrong?  Are you able to disseminate any new information?  I 
>think not.  A lot of noise.  No information.  The usual.  My guess is 
>that the post was made so that a bunch of guys who were present could 
>give themselves a deserved pat on the back for a job well done.  They 
>did it at the expense of her privacy but so what. If that what it 
>takes to motivate you that's fine.  For the record, its called self 
>aggrandizement.  We just don't buy into that or the notion that we 
>need to feed the wolves to keep them quiet.
>
>If there was a shred of useful or new information, I would support 
>giving it out for all to learn from.  There is nothing new or 
>revealing here.  All basic stuff that could occur on any dive.  If by 
>chance we can glean some knowledge from this, the boorish behavior of 
>a few will insure that it doesn't get posted.  The technique of 
>senseless attacks under the pretense of asking a legitimate question 
>won't work.  No one cares what some dimwitted internet interloper has 
>to say.
>
>Joe Citelli 

<<Learn About Trimix At http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix>>
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]