George, I have listened to what you have said over the years, I was trying to look at it from point of view of quantifying it. My thoughts were really just academic. It would be interesting to look at the RBC changes over a partial pressure gradient, to see the onset of the rigidity. Just a thought for someone looking for a PhD project. Let me out of here B4 I bury myself! Jeff the Darwinian............heard a rumour about May / Sydney. ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*> To: <swanncruz@oc*.ne*.au*>; "George Irvine" <kirvine@sa*.ne*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; <quest@gu*.co*> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:09 PM Subject: RE: Red Blood Cell Rigidity > Narcotic level is easy - any increase is more narcotic than no increase. > Impairment starts immediately, and just gets worse. > > As for rigidity due to nitrogen tension, it appears to be relieved by the > presence of helium in the same fashion - the more helium , the less tension. > > We have found that <30% is not going to do a whole lot . 25% is the minimum > useful range for deco gas, 30 for diving, and then we are talking <120 feet. > For all else we go to at least 35 and prefer higher. > > After thousands, as in the tens of thousands, of man dive hours in the WKPP > doing extreme exposure mixed gas dives over the course of 16 years , and > intensely over the last 9 years, these have been our findings. > -----Original Message----- > From: swanncruz@oc*.ne*.au* [mailto:swanncruz@oc*.ne*.au*] > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:03 AM > To: George Irvine; techdiver@aquanaut.com; quest@gu*.co* > Subject: Red Blood Cell Rigidity > > > "High partial pressures of nitrogen cause the red cells to become rigid > and > get hung up in capillaries or damage them. The response of the body to > this > and the immune response tend to close off the area . Anyone ( but a dive > instructor) can see what that means for decompression." > Hi George & List, > As always, thanks for the info. > With respect to red cell rigidity with a high pp of N2, my knowledge of > physiology has dulled somewhat over the years, but red cells do distort > (squash) as they move through smaller capillaries, which would make the > prospect of increased rigidity of the RBC quite alarming. That is, small > capillaries are smaller than RBC. Hence, it could be that we see RBCs unable > to pass and associated capillary rupture. > Do you think there is a threshold partial pressure where the effect of RBC > rigidity becomes marked, or is there a linear change? > I would think there would be an age variable here as well. > If so, did this (theoretical) threshold partial pressure of N2 (causing > BBC rigidity) influence the GUE recomended mixes? > I realize you are keeping the narcotic values at around or less than 30m. > What I am getting at is a "threshold physiologically damaging pp of N2", > as well as a narcotic level. > We seem to be able to quantify a narcotic value (=level). > This is fascinating stuff, and would keep some PhD students going for > years. > Regards, > Jeff the Darwinian. > > I'm going to send this quick, B4 I confuse myself any further............. > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]