Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*>
To: "Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: FW: Decompression - Questions on Repetitive Dives
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 06:31:08 -0500


-----Original Message-----
From: George Irvine [mailto:girvine@be*.ne*]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 6:32 PM
To: Miranda Alldritt; Quest@Gu*. Com
Subject: RE: Decompression - Questions on Repetitive Dives



This area of the discussion needs to be prefaced by a couple of important
reminders. One, keep in mind what I said about the level of offgassing in
bubble form when the move is made to 1 ATA at the surface - this can be a
real shower of bubbles if you do not follow the ascent recommendations that
I made. Be that as it may, the other important point is the bubbles tend to
GROW post dive as they take like gas in from around them. They peak in size
and then diminish. This is all relative. If you look at decompression
folklore, like what IANTD teaches, you will see references to bubbles
peaking in size and frequency up to four hours after a dive. First of all,
this applies more to people who should not be diving in the first place, and
secondly it applies to air diving where there is no adequate way to
decompress.

In my case, I totally clear of any signs of bubbles from the most horrendous
dives in 30 minutes or less. That is what you should shoot for , but more
importantly, shoot for no bubbles to start with by following my final ascent
guidelines. Bubble growth is fact life. Showering bubbles post dive is a
screwup.

As far as "residual nitrogen" or helium or whatever, this is total bullshit.
It is inherently more true for nitrogen since we are full of it anyway, but
the fact is the only consideration you have to give to repets is in the
concept of ascent once you have taken a surface interval and may be still
bubbling - you have to be far more careful about your ascent rate on a
second dive due to this effect. See my post on "why we do not bounce dive"
for all the reasons.

Otherwise, repetitive diving is a good thing, and you should do your
shallower dive first and then your deeper one. The stupidity taught in that
regard is beyond the pale.

-----Original Message-----
From: Miranda Alldritt [mailto:miranda@pa*.co*]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:18 AM
To: trey@ne*.co*
Subject: Decompression - Questions on Repetitive Dives


Hi George,
Thanks for the great discussion so far.
I read your earlier post on repetitive 150 dives but there are some
things I still don't quite get.  Would you mind going into repetitive
dive planning in a little more depth?  How do you account for various
surface intervals and what are your guidelines for what's reasonable in
terms of multiple dives in a day?
As an example to look at, can you tell me how you would plan for 2 dives
to 200ft for 30 minutes each with various surface intervals?  When I
look at this in DecoPlanner, even with an SI of 3 hours, I get a really
long O2 stop for the second dive.  Is that a reality?  Also, nothing
else in the deco seems to really change?

Thanks in advance,

Miranda

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]