Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: annemarie <am23uk@ya*.co*.uk*>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 200209 18:30:00
Subject: Re: More crap on Divernet
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com

Good afternoon oh mistaken one.



If you look at the subject header, you would see that

I was referring to more crap being posted on Divernet.

If you do not know who Dom is, then you can't have

been reading techdiver too much, he posted a load of

crap about helmets a short while ago (sorry Dom, but it WAS crap).  I have
posted

to the list before but a long time ago. 



My post WAS intended for techdiver and not 

that esteemed publication, Diver.  



Language irrelevant, don't see any need to moderate it in accordance with where
I am posting, if it makes even 1 person question their safety practice then
great.



Hope that clears up your confusion.



An answer for Richard



Richard's email to me:



Understanding the safety issues, don't you

think

> when applied to rec scuba

> that the cost will be prohibitive?  If we as rec

> scuba instructors say this

> is the way to dive, and they can't afford the

> equipment (cannister light

> cost jumps to mind), then we are opening ourselves

> to increased liability if

> we don't provide the gear for them during open water

> training.



*************



Oh please, what a cop out! Sorry, I forgot, it's only

people's lives we are talking about here. To quote

just one incident, a STUDENT died in a loch near me a

few years back in 12 metres of water, YES 12 METRES.

Cause? Dive centre skipping out the proper basic

safety stuff to save money. In rec scuba a canister light should not be
necessary at the

depths prescribed, i.e. 18 metres for open water

course, a cheaper torch will suffice perfectly. The

industry makes enough money anyway to fork out for the

basics..it's just f*cking money grabbers who don't

want to put their hand in their pocket and get the

right gear for students. The sooner the agencies take note and review their
course curriculum, the better. There is not enough focus on safety BY FAR, it's
just a big money making machine that works on the "open your wallet and if you
die we couldnt give a f*ck" basis. NOT ACCEPTABLE. Just take a look at the
accident / death rate in the UK alone last year. Some of the gear/teachings I
have seen for students is of an absolutely shocking quality - believe me, I've
been there and been taken into open water with NO dry suit orientation and the
inflator disconnected to get around the prescribed standards relating to it.
The annoying part is that complaints are not actioned by agencies who prefer to
take the side of the dive centre who is making them money!! What a farce. Oh
and after asking a few instructors if they have heard of DIR, the response was
D'uh, what's that? DIR needs more presence in the UK and especially Scotland,
where it is virtually unheard of.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]