Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Preston Hobbie" <hphobbie@at*.ne*>
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Re[6]: UNESCO
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:24:12 -0500
I was an educational snob like that when I worked at the university and was
publishing articles myself. However, a few years in the real world and I
learned that people make their living in many different ways. A formal
education is not a guarantee for success, nor is it a guarantee of being
smart.

I have found, through personal experience with Bob Decker, that he is a
thoughtful, intelligent and thinking human being who can logically look at
both sides of a situation. The personal attacks on him are unwarranted.
Calling wreckers and others terrorists and saying blue collar Americans
right now doesn't sit well. Being passionate about a subject does not mean
you need to be disrespectful, nor does it mean that you need to carry it to
two boards.

H. Preston Hobbie
FAX and Phone 317-891-8072

-----Original Message-----
From: Aldo Solari [APS] [mailto:aldo.solari@ho*.se*]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:44 PM
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com; RDecker388@ao*.co*
Subject: Re[6]: UNESCO


Mr.  Decker,  you  do  not  only  ignore what UNESCO has done for
cultural  heritage  and the biosphere worldwide but dont have the
slightest  idea  on fish population dynamics. You are the typical
"blue  collar america" who insult, kick around and shout due lack
of  arguments,  education  and respect for others. While I cannot
culturize  you  through  an electronic forum, I urge you to go to
some  evening courses at the university, read about what you like
to discuss and watch up your mouth.

Without  a  track  record  in  scientific research or diving, you
hardly have a place to argue here.

----
aldo.solari@ho*.se* (fisheries biologist)
Home page, www.ccbb.ulpgc.es/fish-ecology/solaris
----

RDecker388@ao*.co*

Rac> In a message dated 10/23/01 10:26:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Rac> aldo.solari@ho*.se* writes:


>> .   Wreckers  should  study  basics  in  law,  cultural
>> heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology. Nobody will get
>> killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
>> some field work with specialized instructors.
>>

Rac> Tell you what, Chief, I studied archeology, the underwater variety to
be
Rac> specific, while in college.  I even gave a bit of thought to doing
degree
Rac> work in anthropology.  I know several professional archeologists well,
Rac> particularly those specializing in submerged cultureal materials. Wanna
hear
Rac> my "enlighted and educated" view of UNESCO?  It stinks.  It will do
nothing
Rac> to protect anything worth protecting, will result in a "black market"
of
Rac> wreck diving and fishing resulting in the location of potentially
culturally
Rac> significant sites going unreported and has the potential to destroy the
Rac> recreational diving industry.

Rac> You use passionate, insulting commentary such as "terrorists," "wreck
Rac> grubbers" and "cutural resource killers," yet likely have never been
involved
Rac> in an underwater archeological project yourself.  You come off as
someone
Rac> lost in the hallowed halls of academia with little or no understading
of the
Rac> real world and how it works.

Rac> The fact is, the majority of the wreck divers I know are fairly
conciencious
Rac> people.  They aren't about to strip artifacts off of any sites that are
Rac> truely significant cultural resources.  The vast majority of worthwhile
sites
Rac> that have been identified have been found and reported by sport divers,
not
Rac> professional archeologists.  In contrast, archeologist often are the
worst
Rac> hackers/destroyers/treasure hunters that exist.  Take a trip to Port
Royal
Rac> Jamaica and see the rotting, rusting, crumbling artifacts left to waste
away
Rac> by archeologists due largely to a lack of funding.  These items are of
some
Rac> significance and obviously would be better cared for if in the hands of
a few
Rac> "wreck gutters," who would conserve and display them, instead of in the
hands
Rac> of professional archeologists!

Rac> Here's a thought.  You want to protect all the wrecks laying in your
Rac> country's sovereign waters, go for it.  However, if you want to muddle
in the
Rac> territorial waters of other countries, thanks but no thanks, we'll keep
care
Rac> of our own.

Rac> (I'm not even going to touch the nonsense you put forward concerning
fishing,
Rac> degradation of fish stocks, etc.  A six year old with a kindergarten
Rac> education would recognize that for a crock of bull).


Rac> your wrote--------

Rac> Art, there are three points I would like to clarify:

Rac> (1). There are international guidelines (given by UNESCO) for the
Rac> concept  of  "cultural/natural heritage" on both sea and land. In
Rac> principle,  everything  *is*  cultural/natural  heritage  unless
Rac> declared  otherwise. And this goes beyond the interest of many of
Rac> those divers who "take a piece home" (ie. deny to others the very
Rac> same sites where they themslves liked to dive);

Rac> (2).  Combination  of  scuba gear + spear fishing is forbidden in
Rac> many  countries. The reason is very clear: spear fishing combined
Rac> to  scuba  gear  imply  the local extinction of many coastal fish
Rac> species.  A  well  of  scientific  (exclusion)  studies have been
Rac> conducted on this in the Mediterranean; even the sole presence of
Rac> divers (who just watch) is known to disturb many species.


Rac> (3).  Mixing  up  spear  fishing  and trawling is demagogy: spear
Rac> fishing  is  aimed  at  coastal species while trawling is done on
Rac> demersal  or  pelagic species at a minimum of 5 km off the shore.
Rac> The  species  are  different. While trawling is known to collapse
Rac> fish populations so does spear fishing in coastal systems.

Rac> The  level  of education in the diver population is low both here
Rac> and  in  the US. Training is solely technical, quality is bad and
Rac> it  lacks  several  subjects  which are highly significant. There
Rac> should be course work at university level for those interested in
Rac> a  diving  license.  The  University  of  Barcelona  (Spain), for
Rac> instance,  has  started  such  couses  and  it  is  a  very  fine
Rac> initiative.   Wreckers  should  study  basics  in  law,  cultural
Rac> heritage,  social  anthropology  and  archeology. Nobody will get
Rac> killed by going to some seminars, reading some material and doing
Rac> some field work with specialized instructors.

Rac> In  the  US,  course work is always expensive. However, you could
Rac> talk to many people from public universities who -I am sure- will
Rac> be  more  than  glad  to  talk you through 4-5 seminars on diving
Rac> related aspects for free.

Rac> Cheers,

Rac> ----
Rac> aldo.solari@ho*.se* (fisheries biologist)
Rac> Home page, www.ccbb.ulpgc.es/fish-ecology/solaris
Rac> ----


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]