Joe, maybe he wanted to just rant. Most of these big timers can't even do a frog kick and dive like a bull in a china shop. The bungee issue is old news. -----Original Message----- From: "Joseph Citelli"<joe@po*.co*> To: "Kevin Rottner"<kevin@So*.co*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com Date: Sat Sep 22 19:01:12 PDT 2001 Subject: Re: Bungee Wings of Death >Hi Kevin: > >You missed my point (or perhaps I didn't express myself clear enough). > >The bungee wings are ludicrous. No question about it. My point was that >instead of calling the guy a stroke on another list, you should have >explained to him why the bungee wings are less than optimal. What you >explained on this list (unless you cc'd him) does him no good. He is most >probably at a point in his diving where he REALLY doesn't know the >difference. Maybe you could be the one to open his eyes. > >Then again, maybe you already did this and were just venting here. If so, >thats fine. If not, maybe you should think about doing so. > >Regards. > >Joe > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Kevin Rottner <kevin@So*.co*> >To: Joe <joe@po*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:26 PM >Subject: Bungee Wings of Death > > >> So did you explain why he might not want to do that? >> >> Just curious. >> >> Regards. >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> Hey Joe. >> OMS markets their "Elastomeric Retraction Bands" as a device that " >Assists >> in deflation" and "Elimination of air shift " and " Low drag / low snag " >> and finally " Trim Adjustability." These are the buzzwords. But I really >> think people dive them because they " look tech ". I personally think >that's >> why people still dive with cages or cobras, and things like ten brass >snaps >> on their for no reason. >> But these " look tech " bungees are really an evil plot, much like the >> Russians and Water Fluoridation. ( I think we need a few more laughs a >> little more often on this list .... ) >> Why I think they are bad: >> 1. Even loose, they can prevent you from getting all your lift out of a >> bladder, and the tighter the worse the problem. >> 2. Even loose, you cannot fully orally inflate them, and once again, the >> tighter they are, the worse the problem. >> 3. Even when set "right", they create surface folds on the bladder which >> increase turbulence and create more drag than they could ever eliminate. >> 4. They can trap air in a wing not allowing you to fully deflate the wing >> sort of the reverse of # 1 ) >> 5. The bands hold the bladder closer to the diver, closer to the center of >> gravity, this can effect roll, and making some positions more difficult. >> 6. A stuck dump valve can become a fatal failure even with moderately >tight >> bands, literally power dumping your wing, on the way to the bottom. >> 7. I'm a wreck diver, and they can be serious snag points, despite the >> marketing claims. >> But don't take my word for it. Research the Jane Orenstein fatality, dual >> steels and a wetsuit in a mix course, body recovered by some of those on >> this list. Check out the Ben Longhi fatality, totally attributable to >those >> dams cords. Or research John Claypool / Andre Smith / Mike Ekin >fatalities. >> I could go on and on ...... I also grow tired of burying divers. >> What purpose do they have. If you don't need it ...... >> >> Kevin >> >> > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]