Cristina wrote: #I also got this one mean-spirited response from a person in the UK: >> You're on a deep dive in cold water. You're wearing your drysuit with >> normal drysuit underwear. When you have incurred a significant >> decompression obligation, you accidently rip your suit on a jagged piece >> of metal, and it floods. You immediately abort the dive, but still must >> do your decompression. On the deco line you start to become very cold, >> and due to the cold, your off-gassing efficiency is significantly reduced. > > serves you right ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Oh well. I hope that this isn't the general attitude over there when someone #has an accident such as this. It wasn't me who said that ... but to some extent it's true. An almost universal concept in tech diving appears to be fail-safe/redundancy of equipment and technique. If you really are diving in such cold water, and you think there is a realistic chance of a major flood if you tear the suit, then perhaps you should think of a wearing a close-fitting thick-neoprene drysuit (dampsuit). The simple fact is that, when full of water, a neoprene drysuit has far more residual insulation (and buoyancy) than an equivalent membrane one in the same state. It's arguably a much simpler, and potentially less hazardous, fall-back position than rushing to the surface 30' early to change suits :-) (Yes I know they're not as comfortable otherwise) Bob Talbot
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]