Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: ts064@mc*.co* (Jeffrey Weidner)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: IANTD courses..
From: rkw@da*.ne* (Richard Wackerbarth)
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 09:43:11 -0600
ts064@mc*.co* (Jeffrey Weidner) writes:

>One way around this (at least in some colleges) is to "test out of a
>certain class"  Take a test see how much you really know and if you pass
>by an acceptable measure go on to the next level.  Why not pressure the
>agencies to do the same

I think that this is one of the more constructive suggestions.

For a minimal fee (just to cover materials and time to grade/review the
exam), you can attempt to meet the prerequisites for the next course.

If you fail to make a superior grade on the exam, you agree to take the
course that you failed to "place out". If your score is acceptable (better
than just "passing"), you agree to take the following course and are
permitted to do so.

This certainly would work just fine for the "academic" portions of courses
and might also work for the performance courses. It is consistent with the
PADI philosophy of "performance based" and "self study" that they apply to
OW certification. I agree that other agencies should consider it for all
levels of certification.

I do have a few concerns about performance courses. For some of these
courses, the proper evaluation of the student needs to be made over a
period of time and IMHO cannot be adequately done in a single "exam"
setting.

As an example, assume that you have an experienced OW diver who wants his
"Full Cave" certification.  How much of the diving could be reasonably
omitted.  If you do not omit any of the dives, have you really omitted
anything?

In my case, our instructor was able to quickly review most of the academics
and we spent additional time actually diving. His attitude was "you have
paid for x days of my time. I'll teach you as much as I can within that
period." In the case of another student that we refered to him, he has
spent even more time than "average" to meet the minimums of the
certification level.

In general, I guess that you "get what you pay for". The instructor that
wants to do a quality job will do so. Others might not be as willing to
consider flexibility. However, the agencies should create the options.
IMHO, they will profit from the goodwill of the satisfied students.

----
Richard Wackerbarth
rkw@da*.ne*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]