Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Scott and/or Julie Gudmundsen" <gudmund@si*.co*>
To: "Porter, Greg" <Gregory.Porter@AR*.Bo*.co*>
Cc: "Techdiver Mailing List" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: CO detection
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:04:42 -0600
Greg,

I've made literally hundreds, maybe a thousand P.P. fills. I use regular
compressor air from my regular old compressor. I fill pretty fast, I don't
have time to fart around. I clean my tanks once a year with Simple Green, I
don't do anything to my regulators, including my 100% 02 regulator, which
has a low pressure hose as well as a high pressure hose going to a
submersible pressure gauge, both made of butyl rubber with no lining other
than butyl rubber... which is a hydrocarbon if I've ever heard of one...
it's a flipping petroleum product! Used it for over twenty years, never
cleaned it.

Dive industry/shop bullshit. Be a sucker and go buy an 02 safe regulator and
I'll buy your old one for $20!

Scott Gudmundsen
Vernal, Utah (soon moving to Carson City, Nevada to check out the diving in
Lake Tahoe!)
My technical diving website at: www.fotofixer.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Porter, Greg" <Gregory.Porter@AR*.Bo*.co*>
To: "Porter, Greg" <Gregory.Porter@AR*.Bo*.co*>;
<techdiver@aquanaut.com>; <Cetaceans@ya*.co*>;
<vbtech@ci*.co*>; <FLTechDiver@mikey.net>; "'Bill Wolk'"
<BillWolk@ea*.ne*>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: CO detection


> Hi Bill,
>
> > ----------
> > From: Bill Wolk[SMTP:BillWolk@ea*.ne*]
> >
> > On 8/30/01 Porter, Greg, Gregory.Porter@AR*.Bo*.co* wrote
> >
> > >Given the possibility of having an undetected Oxygen flash while PP
> > filling,
> > >and given that the resultant Carbon Monoxide in the cylinder would be
> > >tasteless, odorless, and lethal, is anyone testing fills with a CO
> > detector
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Greg -
> >
> > Before we get to the carbon monoxide detector, where did you come up
with
> > the idea that there's such a thing as an "undetected Oxygen flash" in
the
> > first place?
> >
> Heard it from a few different different divers and at least one dive shop
> technician.  Didn't dream it up myself. If you know different give me your
> experience.
>
> > It sounds like another gas handling "monster in the closet story"
foisted
> > on the diving public ... <snip>
> >
> I assume from this statment that you don't know either....
>
> > Would everyone out there who has experienced a "detected Oxygen flash"
> > please write Greg so he understands the magnitude of the problem he's
> > trying to "fix."
> >
> That was the original intent of the post.... not sure you're adding
anything
> constructive here nor that anyone needs your permission to provide input.
> Again give your experience if you have any.
>
> > Let's start at the beginning: oxygen is an oxidizer. It is not itself
> > combustible. For there to be an "oxygen flash," your tank already has to
> > be contaminated with something combustible  and that fuel has to ignite.
> > Have you ever found oil in your tanks when they've been VIP'ed?
> >
> No. I'm talking about O2 cleaned cylinders PP filled and topped off with
> appropriately filtered air.
>
> >  If so, I have a few tips for you that are more important than the CO
> > detector:
> >
> As the answer was no, the tips on dirty air are irrelevant.
>
> > The key to safe technical diving -- call it DIR or not -- is to identify
> > *real* problems and to solve them as simply as possible.
> >
> Agreed
>
> > Exaggerating problems that rarely exist in the real world and then
coming
> > up with
> > convoluted solutions to solve these non-existent problems makes diving
> > more dangerous, not less.
> >
> Purely based on your post I'm still not sure that an undetected O2 flash
is
> an 'Exaggerated problem rarely existing in the real world"  because you've
> provided no input to the contrary other than your assumptions.  Any real
> experience you have in this regard would be meaningful input.
>
> It appears that all you're essentially saying is that CO contamination
will
> not occur if you have clean tanks and air fills. That's not the real
world..
> and that's not the attitude that PP filling is based on.
>
> I'm certainly no expert (hence the post to the Lists) but my understanding
> is that PP filling practices are based on the assumption that in this real
> world the cleaning of tanks and air may not remove all the combustible
> hydrocarbons.  Therefore we should PP fill the O2 very slowly just in case
> there are HC's present.  Now let's say that we mess up and PP fill our O2
> too fast and lets assume that we actually did have some HC's find their
way
> into our 'clean' environment... we have combustion which produces CO...
> ordorless, tasteless, and toxic.
>
> Hopefully now we're on the same page.  So here are the pertinent
questions:
>
> - Is this so rare that we needn't worry about it ?
>
> - Do we hear the combustion ?
>
> - Is there an inexpensive, quick, and easy method to check for CO in the
> final fill ?
>
> As intended in the original post and hopefully clarified here.... inputs
> from those with experience are appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Greg
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]