Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: <barlowg@gt*.k1*.oh*.us*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Mares Regs-DIR?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:37:07 -0400

Greg, lot's of good regs including Mares out there, but Apeks is the best.

-----Original Message-----
From: barlowg@gt*.k1*.oh*.us* [mailto:barlowg@gt*.k1*.oh*.us*]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:07 AM
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Mares Regs-DIR?


First off, I would like to introduce myself.  My name is Greg Barlow 
and I have been an avid reader of the postings for the last year.  
The information presented has been very educational for me as I 
slowly make the move to become a DIR diver.

As a writer for Rodale's Scuba Diving Magazine I have been 
fortunate enough to watch the evolution of DIR from various 
avenues, and have been impressed with the forethought and 
experience that has made the DIR philosophy what it is today.

My rig consists of the following: Halcyon backplate and harness, 
Explorer 55# wings, Highland Mills bands, and AL80's for backgas. 
I chose the aluminum cylinders due to the fact that I make at least 
25% of my dives while diving wet.  I had a real fear of not being able 
to swim up a doubled pair of steel tanks, despite the loss of a 
considerable amount of gas due to the low volume of 80's.

Anyway...I use Mares MR12 regs exclusively (exception of Mares 
R2 piston regs for side bottles), and am curious as to why more 
divers don't use the MR12.  I see the benefits as: 1. A very robust 
first stage with minimal parts considering that it is a balanced 
diaphragm. 2. There are a total of 5 LP ports, which greatly aids in 
hose placement. 3. Provided you use a polymer second stage, it is 
easily disassembled underwater allowing full access to the 
diaphragm and exhaust valve. 4. The second stage is very simple, 
yet provides Navy Class A performance. 5. The Vortex Assisted 
Design limits free-flows, while providing little to no positive 
pressure. 6. I can rebuild a second stage in around 15 minutes 
even while in the field.

As a regulator tech for different brands, I understand and appreciate 
the wide spread exceptance of the Apeks and Scuba Pro models, 
but feel that the MR12 has a lot to offer.  I don't claim that it is 
better, but still deserves consideration.

I'm not alone in this opinion either, as two of my fellow dive buddies 
also use the MR12's, and they are both GUE trained cavers.

My intent is not to come on board as an "expert", but merely as a 
student.  If I am totally out of line, then I'm certain that I'll hear it.

In closing, I've been diving since 1975, and as you may have 
guessed, the original Voit MR12 holds many warm memories in my 
heart.  Yeah, I'm sure that my bias toward the MR12 comes from 
sentimental reasons as much as from any other....

GREG


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]