Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: terry michael <OEA51@go*.co*>
Subject: Re: Silent Submersion Vs Dacor
To: Bryon Bertrim <bryon@be*.co*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
>everybody purchased mine used for about 1K and later sold it for the same. I
>liked the Dacor but its a poor mans scooter . Sort of like a Escort sport
>vs. a 'Vette. There is a big difference but you only appreciate it once you
>have used it for a while. And we tend to believe in what we have until you
>try something better. 

I agree the Mako is the production scooter of choice. (the canister scooters
are not production in my opinion) Anyway, I can really appreciate a production
scooter that is factory set-up as a tow behind. The Decor was designed as a
ride on top to hold onto with your hands only and no towline. Can you imagine?
They are reliable however and can be set-up better by simply using a soldering
gun, 1 meter cave line and a bolt snap...:-)



-----Original Message-----
From: "Bryon Bertrim"<bryon@be*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Date: Tue Aug 21 07:29:46 PDT 2001
Subject: Re: Silent Submersion Vs Dacor

>The point here is not Gavin design Vs Dacor but to truly understand when one
>unit is better suited for the type of diving to done. I purchased the SS
>unit to dive deep wrecks in big current. The Gavin design is extremely well
>suited for this purpose. It absolutely puts the diver in the most steam
>lined position possible. A wreck being like a cave requires you to maneuver
>in very tight areas. This design  allows the diver to ride with in an inch
>of the bottom and still pick up bottles or tanks etc..Maintaining this
>position is just as important in 30 Ft as 500.
>
>As for the single handle its a dream to use once you get used to riding a
>true tow behind. Even most Gavin owners drive with one hand in the 12
>O'clock position the motorcycle style handle is beefier and finishes the
>concept of controlling the unit in the 12 o'clock position.  Slight
>movements with your arm can make a large changes in direction. These types
>of Scooters are used in the Ocean and wreck diving everyday. I believe if
>you truly got a chance to try one for 3-4 dives you would see the light. The
>shortest unit is only slightly larger than the Apollo. But the tow behind
>aspect of both breaking the water ahead of you while keeping the diver
>horizontal is inherent in this design. And for always having the unit
>available. What's better having your scooter fall down between your legs
>when you stop running or having it sit perfectly balanced just ahead of you
>ready for you to reach over and crank on the gas. A stock Mako will smoke an
>Apollo and rewinding the Mako adds about 25% more smoke.
>
>You are correct about the Apollo price, the list of the Apollo is 2K. I like
>everybody purchased mine used for about 1K and later sold it for the same. I
>liked the Dacor but its a poor mans scooter . Sort of like a Escort sport
>vs. a 'Vette. There is a big difference but you only appreciate it once you
>have used it for a while. And we tend to believe in what we have until you
>try something better. Jim i have a email from you 2.5 yrs ago when you said
>that Neo dry suits were the best now you dive with a DUI 450. There is a
>little story i read to my kids called Green Eggs & Ham........Many of us
>resisted DIR and WKPP experiences venomously believing it only applied to
>Cave diving in Florida but once we try each aspect we realize its broad
>application and completness. And in this case the Gavin design is on the top
>of the list. I have never had a new piece of gear stand out this much since
>Helium.
>
>And JT,  Rodney or Trey should be interested in giving you a Scooter for
>your deep dive but I'm sure they would want payment in full prior to the
>great event.
>
>Good Luck
>BB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Capt JT" <captjt@mi*.co*>
>To: "Bryon Bertrim" <bryon@be*.co*>; "Wendell Grogan" <wgrogan@dc*.ne*>
>Cc: "Techdiver Mailing List" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:01 PM
>Subject: Re: Silent Submersion Vs Dacor
>
>
>> I guess you don't know as much as you say, its funny how on this list you
>> can post one thing and those that lurk come out, the guy who built the one
>> I used knew whose I used and why it was so dam slow. I let Tom (a
>> friend)use the SS and I dusted his ass with my Apollo at 220ft on the
>Doria
>> and had to keep stopping so he could keep up... They now tell me that they
>> are correcting the motors in the SS, but they still will have a problem
>> with that type of trigger motorcycle  handle on the SS. The one I used is
>> only good for depth nothing more, he is willing to come dive with us and
>> let us test the new ones, so I may change my mind, but the one I saw/used
>> was a piece of shit, except for the depth rating and should be replaced at
>> no cost.... Would I use it on one of my deep dives, sure the Apollo/Dacors
>> won't cut it past 250ft, the SS has been to a max depth of 360ft, I have
>> made 6 dives PAST that depth and 3 more planned for Oct. one will be past
>> 500ft, you think that scooter is tough let me use one on that dive, I'll
>> test it and let you know.....
>>
>> BTW if you paid 2K for an Apollo someone saw you coming.....
>>
>>
>>
>> At 11:12 AM 8/20/01 -0400, Bryon Bertrim wrote:
>> >JT and boys
>> >I believe your your opinion is way off base, the Silent Submersion units
>are
>> >only comparable to a Gavin and Zepp performance wise, like the Gavin they
>> >both utilize a beefed up Oceanic Mako motor running at 24 volts my guess
>> >around 1300 RPM they are depth rated to 500 ft/ beyond and durable as
>hell.
>> >The Dacor/Apollo is a light duty inexpensive toy by comparison, yes you
>may
>> >mod the triggers and beef up the outer shell to handle a bit more depth
>but
>> >that is it. The Dacor runs a single 12 volt 24 Amp hr battery and run at
>500
>> >RPM the smallest SS unit uses 2 x18 amp hrs batteries and the mid range
>uses
>> >2 x26 Amp/hr. So you can say that the SS unit is heaver and more
>expensive
>> >but the towing power of an SS is over 3 X more than any Dacor. You have
>to
>> >worry about the Dacors just making it to the dive site the case is so
>thin.
>> >DIR means just that buy the right equipment for the job and the SS unit
>is
>> >an expedition class scooter. I use the SS's addition power maneuvering in
>> >moderate to heavy current much like cave flow its bull nose breaks the
>water
>> >around the diver and equipment allowing you to handle more flow with less
>> >stress. In a more recent comparison an SS unit to Dacor i had to de-pitch
>> >the SS's prop to 4 out of 9 to allow the Dacor to barely keep up in a no
>> >current shootout and i had more gear. Having owned both there is no
>> >comparison and recommend that if you are into any level of technical
>diving
>> >and can afford it buy a real scooter.. A new Apollo will run you 2K where
>> >for 1.5K more you get 3 X the scooter. All this said, I do agree almost
>any
>> >scooter is better than no scooter at all.
>> >
>> >BB
>> >
>> >FYI Dacor and the Apollo av1 are on in the same. Dacor OEMs them from
>> >Apollo.
>> >http://www.apollosportsusa.com/products-av1.html
>> >www.silent-submersion.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Wendell Grogan" <wgrogan@dc*.ne*>
>> >To: "Capt JT" <captjt@mi*.co*>
>> >Cc: "Techdiver Mailing List" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> >Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:39 PM
>> >Subject: Re: MOD for the new Mako was Re: Purpose of the List
>> >
>> >
>> > > OK, good to know.  But let me ask, easier?  In what way?  Cheaper and
>> > > faster are more obvious.
>> > > Wendell
>> > >
>> > > Capt JT wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I have used the Silent Submersion, if you only dive past 225ft all
>the
>> >time
>> > > > then that is what its good for. It has little use or comparison to
>the
>> > > > Apollo/Dacor scooter, they are faster, easier, and cheaper.....
>better
>> >in
>> > > > my book....
>> > > >
>> > > >   At 12:27 AM 8/19/01 +0200, wendell grogan wrote:
>> > > > >If anyone is interested, Rodney Nairne's scooters have
>> > > > >been a good 50 meters deeper without any problems.  He
>> > > > >sells them as Silent Submersion.
>> > > > >Wendell
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >--- Cam Banks <cam@ca*.co*> schrieb: > Huh,
>> > > > >actually, 55m is essentially the same depth
>> > > > > > rating as a standard Mako:
>> > > > > > 180 feet MOD.  I did take one down to that depth the
>> > > > > > other day, but
>> > > > > > considering how often they leak on just mild dives,
>> > > > > > despite major babying of
>> > > > > > the o-rings, I wouldn't trust one for anything
>> > > > > > serious.  Likely you will end
>> > > > > > up swimming it back, full of water.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cam
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > From: terry michael <OEA51@go*.co*>
>> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 08:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
>> > > > > > > To: Cam Banks <cam@ca*.co*>
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Re: MOD for the new Mako was Re:
>> > > > > > Purpose of the List
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Mako 2 and it's factory rated for 55m anybody done
>> > > > > > deeper?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > From: "Cam Banks"<cam@ca*.co*>
>> > > > > > > To: "terry michael"<OEA51@go*.co*>, "Techdiver
>> > > > > > > (E-mail)"<techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> > > > > > > Date: Fri Aug 17 09:07:58 PDT 2001
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: MOD for the new Mako was Re: Purpose
>> > > > > > of the List
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> What new Mako, please?  Thanks.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Cam
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>> From: terry michael <OEA51@go*.co*>
>> > > > > > >>> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
>> > > > > > >>> To: "David B. Widen" <dwiden@ho*.co*>,
>> > > > > > "Techdiver (E-mail)"
>> > > > > > >>> <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> > > > > > >>> Subject: MOD for the new Mako was Re: Purpose of
>> > > > > > the List
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> MOD for the new Mako.
>> > > > > > >>> The manual states 55m. thanks
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > >>> From: "David B. Widen"<dwiden@ho*.co*>
>> > > > > > >>> To: "Techdiver (E-mail)"<techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>> > > > > > >>> Date: Thu Aug 16 18:55:34 PDT 2001
>> > > > > > >>> Subject: Purpose of the List
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>> Let go back to tech diving issue and thoughts,
>> > > > > > drop the T & A stuff. This
>> > > > > > >>>> is
>> > > > > > >>>> not January with cold and blow out. It is
>> > > > > > August with great diving
>> > > > > > >>>> opportunities.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> David
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > ___________________________________________________
>> > > > > > >>> GO.com Mail
>> > > > > > >>> Get Your Free, Private E-mail at
>> > > > > > http://mail.go.com
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> --
>> > > > > > >>> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
>> > > > > > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > > >>> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
>> > > > > > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
>> > > > > > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > > >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
>> > > > > > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > ___________________________________________________
>> > > > > > > GO.com Mail
>> > > > > > > Get Your Free, Private E-mail at
>> > > > > > http://mail.go.com
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
>> > > > > > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
>> > > > > > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >__________________________________________________________________
>> > > > >Do You Yahoo!?
>> > > > >Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
>> > > > >--
>> > > > >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
>`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > > >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
>> >`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > >
>> > > > "You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get
>in
>> >the
>> > > > water"
>> > > > Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more
>> > > >   Web Site  http://www.capt-jt.com/
>> > > > Email     captjt@mi*.co*
>> > > --
>> > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
>`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>> > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
>`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>> > >
>>
>> "You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in
>the
>> water"
>> Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more
>>   Web Site  http://www.capt-jt.com/
>> Email     captjt@mi*.co*
>>
>>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


___________________________________________________
GO.com Mail                                    
Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]