Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Terri" <terong@pa*.ne*.sg*>
To: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Cc: <dsmith218@ho*.co*>, "Davy" <davydive@te*.co*.sg*>
Subject: Re: Split fins
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:08:06 +0800
Thank You for your frank opinion, and my apologies if I have misquoted
anybody.  I will certainly take your advice and give the Jet fins a try.

Yours Sincerely
Terence Ong Kian Hock


----- Original Message -----
From: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*>
To: "Terri" <terong@pa*.ne*.sg*>; "Techdiver@Aquanaut. Com"
<techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Cc: <dsmith218@ho*.co*>; "Davy" <davydive@te*.co*.sg*>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: Split fins


> Terri, the split fins are bullshit, and your misuse of quotes out of
context
> does not make up for that fact. We use one fin, not several different
fins,
> just like we use one gear configuration  for all occasions. There is never
> any question of what the outcome will be in all contingencies. We don't
use
> stroke gear to do some dives, and the real gear to do others. This kind of
> thinking is what Jarrod and I do not allow near us on our team.
>
> Now, to put to rest one more bullshit slant by you, the fact is the Jetfin
> with its ridiculous holes is no match for the Farrallon fin, and if we
could
> get Farrallon fins, we would use them instead.
>
> "hogarthian" is not what we do. We long ago passed that stage as we were
> needed to really do serious diving and we wanted a system that worked
> everywhere for everything from open water to ice with no changes, and that
> is what DIR is - the evolution of what was begun by Bill Gavin, my former
> dive partner, somebody you never even met. I really resent your misuse of
> him and Jarrod , but then you are making it clear that you have no idea
what
> the hell you are talking about, and are not afraid to prove it.
>
> One more side note: I bought some Scuba Pro "Gorilla" fins back in 1991. I
> figured I would wear them when I dove a wetsuit, and the heavier jets with
> the drysuit. Guess what? The fins were not only a  bullshit gimmick like
the
> split fins and got flimsy after a few dives, but Bill Gavin immediately
told
> me, with Bill "Hogarth" Main standing there with us as the three of us
> prepared to dive, me in my stroke Gorilla fins, "you need to lose the
stroke
> shit".
>
> Terry, when you are putting out bullshit, do not cc me or address me. If
you
> want to know how it is done , you can ask politely. YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHAT
> THE EVOLUTION OF OUR DIVING IS, AND YOU SURE AS HELL HAVE NO BUSINESS
> MISQUOTING MY DIVE PARTNERS. You dive with them, and you can tell me how
it
> works, OK?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terri [mailto:terong@pa*.ne*.sg*]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 7:19 AM
> To: trey@ne*.co*
> Cc: dsmith218@ho*.co*; Davy
> Subject: Re: Split fins
>
>
> I took up diving in 1983 and around that time (if my memory serves me
well)
> the Scuba Pro Jet Fins were introduced, many divers were very sceptical
> about fins with holes in them.  A lot of them said that this was just a
> gimmick by Scuba Pro to sell fins, fortunately there were some divers who
> were willing to give it a try and it was these divers who finally
convinced
> the sceptics.
>
> I have been using the scuba pro twin jets for reef diving and
> non-penetration wreck dives, on many occasions I have swam against
currents
> and have used less air than my much younger and fitter dive buddies using
> the Scuba Pro Jet fins.
>
> However, I will not recommend these fins to divers who intend to lay line
> since the split in the fins can cause entanglement as Mr Davy Koh had
> pointed out to me.
>
> The split fins use a different kick technique which uses less muscle for
> more thrust.  These split fins are certainly not suitable for caving but I
> have found them suitable for non-penetration wreck dives without a DPV.
> I know this goes against DIR and I may, in some Tech circles be considered
a
> STROKE because of my fins, however my reasoning is based on the Hogarthian
> way of thinking, ie. if only my fins can do the job why should I use a DPV
> and fins to perform non-penetration wreck dives.
> To quote Mr Jarrod Jablonski, "In the simplest of terms, the Hogarthian
> concept embodies simplicity and functionality. At the heart of this
concept
> is the conviction of minimalism."
> I sincerely hope that I have not stepped on any bodys toes but I just had
to
> put it down on paper what my views are regarding this topic.
>
>
> Yours Sincrely
> Terence Ong Kian Hock
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>
> > To: David E. Smith <dsmith218@ho*.co*>; Davy <davydive@te*.co*.sg*>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 8:59 AM
> > Subject: RE: Split fins
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Dave, this is pure bullshit. Only a stroke uses split or any other
kind
> of
> > > gimmick fin with gear on and you are giving us one more reason why not
> to
> > > dive with strokes. For instance, if I have a problem I want fins on
that
> > can
> > > deal with it ( and on my buddy ), like Jet fins that will allow you to
> > pick
> > > up a 45 pound dumbbell off the bottom and swim up with it. Try that
with
> > > bullshit fins. Try pushing doubles and gear with floppy fins in a
> current
> > or
> > > to respond quickly , not to mention the lack of control with them. Why
> is
> > it
> > > that you guys only seem to think that maintaining proper skills and
gear
> > is
> > > only a cave thing? Is this a "cold water" thing , too?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David E. Smith [mailto:dsmith218@ho*.co*]
> > > Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 4:45 PM
> > > To: Davy; Techdiver
> > > Subject: RE: Split fins
> > >
> > >
> > > I had heard similar comments about "flimsy and soft" fins from
> > > various split fins.  However, I have a pair of the Atomic split
> > > fin and they are great!  I don't use them in cave, but they
> > > made a believer in "high performance" fins for sure.  Very
> > > efficient, very fast with less effort.  I love them!
> > >
> > > dsmith218@ho*.co*
> > > ICQ# 25409809
> > >
> > > Moderation is for the poor, and the healthy...of which I am neither. -
> > > Polver
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Davy [mailto:davydive@te*.co*.sg*]
> > > Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 10:33 AM
> > > Subject: Split fins
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > On the subjects of drag force and high current diving,
> > > I thought I'll ask you guys your opinions about the latest split fins.
> > >
> > > The split fins seem to be the new revelation in scuba diving now
> > > with many manufacturers currently embracing the "nature wings"
> technology.
> > > When the first one appeared on the market, the Apollo Biofins, I tried
> it
> > > but found it too
> > > flimsy and soft compared to the trusty SP jets. With the split, I also
> > feel
> > > these fins have the potential for entanglement.
> > > But there are many divers, tech divers included, that seemed to swear
by
> > it.
> > > Has anybody else tried using the rest of these "nature wings"? What
are
> > your
> > > comments?
> > > The dive mags are raving about these as well but it's better to hear
> from
> > > the real players here.
> > >
> > > Rgds,
> > > Davy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]