well as far as the boat trip. Here in the Great lakes wer do a lot of them. And the Great lakes are as large as some of the smaller oceans. Working as a First mate on a 47' Ketch for 4 years and teaching sailing on the same vessel I have had my share of expierences with diesel engines and heavy things falling on me. I also remeber more than once having nothing but one arm and a safety harness keeping me from 230' grave in 39 degree water. I remeber another time being atop a 90' mast in 3-5 foot waves. Waves not swells their is a huge difference. I have found that more challenging than any dive I have done. I have done some deeper diving to 130 or so feet in <50 degree water from a boat in a higher current area. Vis of upto 20' if we were lucky. I admit I have no Ocean expierence but from talking to people that have dove in both many feel the great lakes are as challenging if not more in some ways than many ocean dives. I guess it pissed me off because I took it as being called a liar from someone I respected because of their reputation and posts. I guess not haven given you a reason to disbelieve what I posted yet getting ridiculed for it. The post was more about ear problems anyway. I have a training schedule worked out to get my trimix certification by next year if funding works out. I am adapting to a new gear configuration more suitable to tech diving. Once I have got my gear configured and am comfortable in using it I am going to progress to trimix and deeper diving. I look forward to some of the deeper pristeen wrecks we have here in the great lakes. I wonder if you would consider a 250' river chalenging enough for ya ;-) I am not ready for it but I hear there might be a few undiscovered wrecks down there waiting for the right person to find them. There is almost always a current there and the water never gets much warmer than 40 degrees and vis is normally about 5 feet or so.Also the area is heavily traveled by frieghtors. So I guess dives in the Fresh water can be challenging. I feel that anyone Ocean diver or not could find these conditions to be a challenging dive. So we don't all dive in Quarries but I do find the quarry a good place toi train and get used to gear configuration before diving into the river or a deep wreck. To me that makes since and seems like it should be DIR(if it's not). Safety first right? Or do you consider it safe to dive into an advanced dive with new and unfamiliar equipment when you have a nice calm clear place to test it out first. Anyways my medication is just right ;-) Occasionally I have to add a little nitrogen to the mix to feel just right but other than that my antibiotics and decongestants are working just fine ;-) I was trying to point out that this list could be a lot more helpfull to newbies with out the constant badgering but I guess I can go with the flow Thom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Cobb" <Cobber@ci*.co*> To: "Thom Hadfield" <thom.hadfield@ho*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:27 PM Subject: Re: On high current diving Dearest Thom- I neither believe nor disbelieve your 7 knot currents. I guess I'd say I'd have to see it to believe it. At any rate I the picture I had in my mind of being towed through the water at 7 knots was outlined in my post, nothing more. And to be pissed off over such a blatantly silly post as mine points out some problems at your end, not mine, Sir. Perhaps an adjustment of your medication would be in order. I suppose there are various ways to glamorize quarry and river diving, but I think that they are a different type of diving than ocean diving, presenting different, though lessor, challenges. But if that's all you've got then that's all you've got, I suppose. But I do admit to having a hard time feeling Manly Appreciation for those who drive their auto up to the lip of the water (fresh water, usually) don their equipment at their leasure on a dainty tarp so as to not dirty their feet. And then step into the water to knee depth, halting to adjust their gear and contemplate life before proceeding into the depths. No, a dive just does not seem to be a dive unless you have spent hundreds of dollars on a boat trip, spent hours listening to the deafening roar of diesel engines, and either froze or sweated (or both at the same time) in your bunk wondering if you are going to get barfed on again. Ah, yes, and the oders eminating from the head. And it's just not the same if you don't wreck your back and smash your elbows/fingers/knees/shins getting on/off the pitching, rolling boat, have people stomp on and drop heavy shit on your feet and suffer the ravages of salt water and diesel fumes on your hair, eyes, skin and dive equipment. I'm not a horse higher than any of my other ocean diving brethren. I just can't resist tweaking you quarry and river types. Go out and do a few ocean dives and you may find out why you don't get much sympathy from me (and apparently a few others) on this list. Keep it light, Thom, we are just having a little fun. Jim On Monday, July 30, 2001 11:21 PM, Thom Hadfield <thom.hadfield@ho*.co*> wrote: >Well, as the original post that led to this thread my point would be get >your facts straight before accusing others of lying about what they dive. >Cobb jumped my shit when I was telling the truth about a dive I try to do >once a week at least. And just because his dive style isn't one that works >well in high current doesn't mean that those of us who regularly dive these >currents are lying about our dives. That pissed me off. I have been honest >in all my post and took advice and flames alike. Cobb seems to think he is >on a high horse. I respect alot of his posts but when your wrong your wrong. >I have a lot to learn and am training and advancing my training weekly. I am >learning deep diving but that is not the only type of advanced and tech >diving out there. > > >Get the facts first Cobb. And well it looks like Black spoke to soon as >well. > > >Anyways enough bitching this is all about diving right. > >Thom >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael J. Black" <mjblackmd@ya*.co*> >To: "Aquanaut Mail" <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 7:02 PM >Subject: Re: On high current diving > > >> Poor Cobb, not only is he stupid and ugly, he can't even lie well. >> >> Have a nice day, Cobber ("why anybody would want to cripple themselves >> with a wrist deco computer is beyond me")! >> >> MJB ;-) >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger >> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ >> -- >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]