Wendell, If the putative 'robust' correlation b/ stimulation of particular areas of the brain & increased O2 titers has validity, we should all be hanging with our eyes closed. Safe bubbles Esat Atikkan --- Wendell Grogan <wgrogan@dc*.ne*> wrote: > Easy answer: no. > CNS ox-tox is a totally different problem than > pulmonary toxicity. You > can accumulate lung injury over time if you have > repeated exposures > without sufficient time for recovery in between. > CNS toxicity on the > other hand is not well understood in terms of > exactly how it happens, > all we know is what situations increase your risks > of it happening. > It is a problem of the interaction of brain > chemistry and/or circulation > and high oxygen concentration (gas tension). What > ever the trigger is, > it is more of an immediate response to the current > oxygen concentration, > not related to the cumulative exposure over time. > That's not to say its > always instantaneous, rather, its an active process > over a period of > minutes. > (I will now exit Professor mode) > Wendell > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]