Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:49:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Y - valve
From: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
To: Simon L Hartley <shartley@sc*.ed*.au*>
CC: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Simon-

As I said in my opening post, "IMHO" which means "in my humble opinion", y
and h valves suck. I came to this conclusion independent of GUE, DIR but I
do think that George was kicking my ass for some reason or other at the
time. This was perhaps 5 or 6 years ago I fooled around with an H valve as I
thought doubles cost too much and were a burden on the dive boat.

I was wrong, doubles no only provide the iso valve but also the entire
balance thing with wings and a backplate comes into play. The change in
comfort going from a single to doubles was one of those grand improvements
in diving that kept me in the sport. Right up there with canning the bondage
wings, getting a canister light and getting a drysuit.

I really try not to knock stuff on this list unless I have had personal
experience with the system I am knocking and the one I am promoting. It is
just not my style to rant and rave about pro or con this or that unless I
have personally looked at, and tried whatever the system it may be.

And I can tell you, from personal experience, that getting a set of doubles
is the hot setup on many levels, the iso, balance, amount of gas, etc. They
really are better. I guess I should use my pony corollary;

-If you think you need a H valve setup than what you really need are
doubles.
-If you don't think you need doubles then you really don't need an H valve.

   Jim
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Learn About Trimix at http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/

> From: Simon L Hartley <shartley@sc*.ed*.au*>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:13:18 +1000
> To: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
> Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Re: Y - valve
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Thanks for the email.  I don't disagree with your comments.  As I say I'm
> not entirely committed to the whole Y/H valve thing.  I've made many gear
> choices over the years, some good some bad (among other things I've owned
> Spare Airs, pony bottles, SP Air II's and all sorts of other nonsense).  In
> all cases though I've gained some insight (which I occasionally try and
> share, and then usually get to hear others perspectives).  One problem I've
> found with a single first stage is the need for an overly short backup hose
> or to pass the backup under the arm (neither option I particularly like).
> With the H valves I use standard DIR hose lengths and the routing is
> cleaner (no hoses sticking out the sides).  The presentation of H valves as
> an option for recreational divers on the GUE web site and elsewhere and
> advice from other list members was certainly encouraging too.  If the
> timing suits I'm hoping to take a GUE course in Sydney next year, hopefully
> this and other issues can be resolved there.
> 
> FWIW I don't use the H valve to give me access to overhead environments
> (unless you count swim thru's, overhangs, etc, technically yes but then you
> may as well include swimming under a boat (a metre or two either way and
> you've got unobstructed access to the surface)).  Ok I have been through
> more substantial oceanic caves in the past (pre-H valve BTW) but then I've
> done a lot of silly things in the past.  In most of the diving I do I take
> on a leadership role (usually as a DM) so I generally have plenty of
> "redundant" air supplies close at hand (and when I don't I'm more picky
> about my buddies).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> At 12:31 6/07/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>> IMHO, if you are not diving doubles then you should not be getting in
>> virtual or real overhead conditions (i.e. caves, wrecks or deco) so you
>> might as well be a rec diver. Being a rec diver means being able to head to
>> the surface under any emergency condition. Your failure mode for most if not
>> all issues is a controlled ascent to the surface.
>> 
>> Other than that you are fooling yourself using H, Y or whatever systems. If
>> anything it could make matter worse by introducing CF factors into a simple
>> rec rig.
>> 
>> My reasoning on this is to have enough gas to deal with a problem on the
>> bottom even after isolating the valve with the problem, impossible to do
>> with a H or Y valve.
>> 
>> Doubles vs. Singles is more an issue of convenience and logistics. You can't
>> make a silk purse out of a sows ear so if your gonna do it, do it right.
>> Don't overhead dive without doubles.
>> 
>> Jim
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Learn About Trimix at http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/
> 
> 
> Simon
> 
> Simon L Hartley
> RSM Website Coordinator\First Year Course Coordinator
> Associate Lecturer
> School of Environmental Science and Management
> Southern Cross University
> P.O. Box 157
> Lismore NSW, Australia 2480
> Ph: (02) 66203251 or (61 66) 203 251
> Fax:(02) 66212669
> E-mail: shartley@sc*.ed*.au*
> 
> http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/staff/pages/shartley/
> 
> http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/esm/
> 


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]