From: Ed Street <blacknet@ph*.ne*> > If it IS the most successfull then why isn't everyone jumping onthe > bandwaggon? Dive instructors who are also salesmen want to preserve their sales farms. Dive instructors who want to be infallible refuse to change. > I'll tell you why. Because no one wants to hear their > attitudes and egotistical approach to things. Is there some requirement to be on the techdiver list? I seem to have missed that one. That makes me a stroke I suppose. > Equipment wise it maybe better but if everyone sees that equipment and the first thing they think > about is how macho it is because of the actions of some people then how does > that make it 'success' Take a look at the OMS catalog. That stuff is far more macho looking than the DIR rig. Far more macho things have been attempted with rec gear. Track down the "wah-wah" message. It is a real eye opener. I still don't understand how a highly capable system can be criticized because unqualified people attempt to use it. By that logic, railing against the "Expiration" and blind faith in computers would get far more bang for the buck. NetZero Platinum No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month! http://www.netzero.net -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]