Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: story <story@be*.en*.sg*.co*>
To: "'Tech Diver'" <techdiver@opal.com>
Subject: Re: Nitrox I or Nitrox II?
From: "Merenkov, Steve" <svm@hq*.fi*.co*>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 95 23:46:00 EST
I agree that the Monterey Trench does have some DEEP water, but nobody I 
know
dives to 8000 FSW.   I don't have a boat and the local boats, (Cypress Sea, 
Silver Prince) aren't
going to even allow a 100+ ft. dive.  Beach dives, except for maybe 
Monestary? are well within
100 ft. unless you want to swim out 500yds.  As far as dedicated eqmt. I'm 
looking to set up
some sort of standard so I can use it as is without having to do special 
fills for EACH dive.
Nitrox Fills where I live are impossible to find, so I need to have fills 
ready to go, when I go.
I figure that the more experienced Nitrox Divers have probably figured out a 
rule of
thumb for Nitrox I, II fills....

Thanks for your input though,   Steve
 ----------
> From: story
> To: svm
> Subject: Re: Nitrox I or Nitrox II?
> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 1995 8:01PM
>
> Merenkov, Steve writes:
> >
> > [...] The area I will be diving in will
> > be Monterey, CA  which doesn't really offer any dives past 100ft. at 
most!
>
> I beg to differ -- 8000ft is readily available in the Canyon, and if
> you have a boat there are some great dives in the 100-200ft range.
> However, none of those are useful for Nitrox as a bottom mix.
>
> But why do you need to dedicate hardware to one or the other?  Can't
> you just fill your clean tank with one or the other depending on your
> dive?
>
> Curious,
>
> David Story                        NAUI AI Z9588, PADI DM 43922, EMT
> story@be*.wp*.sg*.co*            Every dive is a decompression dive.
>
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]