Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: fhd@in*.ne*
Subject: Re: Ultimate model
From: <Christina_Young@Wa*.Me*.co*>
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 95 13:19:28 EST
Frank Deutschmann (fhd@in*.ne*) wrote:

>The sheer complexity of this model really makes me wonder exactly what
>steps will be taken to validate it -- recall that validation trials are
>typically exponential in the number of variables for sufficient confidence.
>
>I actually heard that ScubaPro dropped their DC based on the Weinke model
>exactly because of the difficulty of validation.  What steps will the Abyss
>people be taking to prove the model?

I don't think that any decompression model could ever be "validated".
The best we can hope to do simulate and test the model under as many
conditions as possible - what you get is a mathematical approximation
that has been empirically confirmed for the conditions in which it
was tested.

I agree with Carl's assertion that the resulting mathematical model
would be better implemented in a lookup table rather than calculated
in real-time.  I also think that a hybrid system (one which is trained
from the math model) could have advantages.

Christina

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]