Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: nautarch@sa*.ed*
To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Wreck Laws - all bad??
From: "Broadwater, J." <jbroadwater@oc*.no*.no*.go*>
Date: 15 Mar 1995 13:44:31 -0500
WHOA!!  I've been reading all the comments and *WARNINGS* and  *ALERTS* and
*WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN* on techdiver about nasty, totally unwarranted laws to
protect shipwrecks.  There was all the old stuff about "most wrecks aren't
important," and "besides, they'll all be destroyed by the *ANGRY [CORROSIVE]
SEA* real soon if we don't all go rip 'em up right away."  There were the
protests of "renewed bureaucratic efforts to yank away our last vestiges of
*INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS*," etc.  Apparently, it's all the result of the United
Nations plan: "Buenos Aires Draft Convention on the Protection of the
Underwater Cultural Heritage."

Okay, most of us are opposed to too much interference by government, but
doesn't anyone on techdiver think some shipwrecks should be preserved? 
Doesn't anyone believe that by protecting historic shipwrecks the government
is actually preserving the rights of those divers--now and in the future--who
want to enjoy seeing the wrecks as they now are?  Doesn't anyone liken
shipwreck preserves to national parks or marine sanctuaries that protect
representative examples of things that make our lives richer and more
meaningful?  And . . . come on now . . . do wreck divers really think that a
few shipwreck preserves will leave you with "no place to dive"?!?

I'm ready to discuss any issue with any body, but I HATE illogical,
emotionally-charged B.S.!  (Can I say B.S. on the net??)  Please, folks, don't
oppose preservation laws without looking at them fairly and objectively.  As
an archaeologist, I don't try to save everything that's connected with the
human race, and, by the same token, I'm hoping that  most people don't want to
destroy all evidence of our past.  

How about somebody (is there a suitable spokesperson?) stating the issues as
follows:  (1) the ACTUAL wording of the offending proposed legislation (too
often, we only get someone's interpretation, not the real facts), (2) the
major objections from the dive community and (3) the suggested alternative
approach to the problem.  I'll be happy to discuss these issues, and I know
there are others who will do the same.  Thanks.

John D. Broadwater
MONITOR Nat. Marine Sanctuary
Bldg. 1519,  Ft. Eustis, VA  23604
804-878-2973 (fax 878-4619)
jbroadwater@oc*.no*.no*.go*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]