>Christopher M. Parrett wrote: > >>So how will the user pick which model? Will he have the choice of generic >>Buhlmann, DCAP (Hamilton-Workman-Schriener, I believe) or RGBM? Will you >>develop a combined model? Will one model be applied for single dives, and >>RGBM for repetitive dives? >> >>John Heinmann >> > > >John: > >If it works out right the RGBM and the Buhlman will be put in a >confrontational mode where both algorithms are competing against one an other. > >Thus we will be evaluating both disolved gas as well as bubble formation at >all times. > >The RGBM will take over for the Surface interval as we model out the >120minute bubble growth that occurs just after surfacing. > >RGBM will also be used for certain repetitive dives where Buhlman breaks down. > >As for DCAP, that will be primarily used for DCS Risk prediction, and dive >profile analysis. > Does this mean that RGBM will not be used to calculate the ascent for an initial stop dive? I thought that bubble models where expected to produce shorter safer decompression profiles than supersaturation models. Barrie Kovish Vancouver, Canada bmk@ds*.bc*.ca*
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]