>So how will the user pick which model? Will he have the choice of generic >Buhlmann, DCAP (Hamilton-Workman-Schriener, I believe) or RGBM? Will you >develop a combined model? Will one model be applied for single dives, and >RGBM for repetitive dives? > >John Heinmann > John: If it works out right the RGBM and the Buhlman will be put in a confrontational mode where both algorithms are competing against one an other. Thus we will be evaluating both disolved gas as well as bubble formation at all times. The RGBM will take over for the Surface interval as we model out the 120minute bubble growth that occurs just after surfacing. RGBM will also be used for certain repetitive dives where Buhlman breaks down. As for DCAP, that will be primarily used for DCS Risk prediction, and dive profile analysis. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Christopher M. Parrett, President, Abysmal Diving Inc. 6595 Odell Place, Suite G. Boulder Colorado, USA 80301 Ph.303-530-7248, fx 303-530-2808 Makers of ABYSS, Advanced Dive Planning Software. Available in English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Swedish. Abyss, Mixed Gas, Technical Nitrox, Recreational Air. Abyss, Technical Logbooks featuring 22 integrated databases.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]