Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Todd
To: Leonard <todd@me*.co*>
Subject: Re: Rebreather Safety
From: Sten Meyer <m87stme@mt*.ch*.se*>
Cc: heinzl@sw*.st*.co*
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 21:10:39 +0100 (MET)
On Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Todd Leonard wrote:

> Someone at tek pointed out that the redundancy that could be
> attained by having two of these devices would address the risks
> I described.  I don't agree -- bringing two (or more) is a good
> way to address "random" infrequent failures of a component, but
> it would still leave one open to deterministic (though uncommon)
> failure modes present in each of the identical devices.  One can
> envision a situation where exceeding a certain depth or time
> would cause a program to overwrite an array bound, for example.

A related question to the readers: at what tank pressure did the first
Suunto Eons experience memory problems?


Answer: 256 bar......

/Sten Meyer                   m87stme@mt*.ch*.se*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]