I have seen enough of your opinions on here - they are worthless because you have no clue, and you prove it with each and every post you make. I am sick of idiots who do nothing yet have all the answers. You are one of many who fit that category. Unfortunately, there are enough of you out there that the accident stats keep racking up, so your bullshit needs to be treated as bullshit and offset with the real story, which many on here who do have a clue and who do dive have already done. I noticed some of your posts and read them only because we have a "David Smith" in the WKPP. It only took a few of your dumb ass comments for me to realize this was not our David Smith. -----Original Message----- From: David E. Smith [mailto:dsmith218@ho*.co*] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 7:06 AM To: Trey; Mike Rodriguez Cc: Joel Silverstein; RDecker388@ao*.co*; rikard.lundgren@sw*.se*; techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: RE: Isolating Manifold Question Trey, Why don't you tell me what part of my post is not factual or clearly indicated as opinion. Meanwhile, I will forget your errors in pointing out the "obvious". dsmith218@ho*.co* ICQ# 25409809 Moderation is for the poor, and the healthy...of which I am neither. - Polver -----Original Message----- From: Trey [mailto:trey@ne*.co*] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 6:35 AM To: David E. Smith; Mike Rodriguez Cc: Joel Silverstein; RDecker388@ao*.co*; rikard.lundgren@sw*.se*; techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: RE: Isolating Manifold Question Dave, you obviously do not dive, and you obviously do not understand any of this, and you are wasting everyone's time with bullshit. Tukker hit the nail on the head. -----Original Message----- From: David E. Smith [mailto:dsmith218@ho*.co*] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 10:49 PM To: Mike Rodriguez Cc: Joel Silverstein; RDecker388@ao*.co*; rikard.lundgren@sw*.se*; techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: RE: Isolating Manifold Question Mike, If you read my posts you will see that I have not advocated any of the options for how to operate your valves. I have stated only that it is not "common sense" that the valve should be fully open. I have stated that a valve not fully shut is open (this in response to the statement that a valve not fully open is shut). I think if you think of the "system response" to the 2 scenarios (partially shut = open or partially shut = shut) you would have to agree with my version. In any case, I think these "arguments" have little to do with the real discussion of whether or not a valve should be fully open or not. I haven't even really gotten into that. I am simply commenting on the "absolutist" posts that make statements of common sense or fact because it suits someone's argument. To this end, what is your source on the design basis of scuba valves being several turns to shut as an "intrinsic safety factor". Also, I think you would have to admit, (without coming to a conclusion on how you should operate your valves) their is a difference in the likelihood of rolling shut an isolator vice an orifice valve. If this argument were made to me, I would counter with.."There is still the likelihood..." But then, that is why we have good technique and don't contact our manifolds. And when in spite of that technique, we do...we check. (Not to start another thread, but my isolator knob is inverted and CAN'T contact the overhead!) In any case, it may amuse you to discover that I keep my isolator fully open. I didn't used to. And I arrived at this decision based very little on any of the arguments posed so far. I just take issue with the fact that some have arrived at conclusions/statements of FACT, without any proof or "authority". So as I go on and on....Let me state one more time what I CONSIDER to be fact...whether it is relevant to the main issue or not. A partially open valve will act like an open valve. A partially open valve will be more easily shut (whether intentionally or not). I should notice an inadvertently shut isolator by monitoring my SPG. If I am too stupid to open my isolator before mixing/filling, then that is Darwin at work. Now, there are many more, more relevant facts. These are just the ones presented (or contradicted) in order to arrive at the decision that the isolator MUST remain fully open. (Lest you be a farm animal or something. <g>) So I plead, argue/discuss/whatever the merits...That is why we are all here (I presume). Let us not dispute fact with opinion and state it as a fact. Happy Diving! Dave Smith dsmith218@ho*.co* ICQ# 25409809 Moderation is for the poor, and the healthy...of which I am neither. - Polver -----Original Message----- From: Mike Rodriguez [mailto:mikey@ma*.co*] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 5:43 PM To: David E. Smith Cc: Joel Silverstein; RDecker388@ao*.co*; rikard.lundgren@sw*.se*; techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: RE: Isolating Manifold Question At 11:11 AM 4/15/2001 -0400, David E. Smith wrote: Hello David, >If it is not shut, it is open. A bump on a fully open valve results in a non-event. The same bump on a mostly closed valve can result in an accident, maybe a fatal one, as analysis of several diving deaths over the years related to inadvertently closed isolators suggests. If it can happen to other divers, it can happen to any of us, including you. -Mike Rodriguez <mikey@mi*.ne*> http://www.mikey.net/scuba Pn(x) = (1/(2^n)n!)[d/dx]^n(x^2 - 1)^n -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]