Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <bigvon@be*.ne*>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:41:08 +0000
To: pina <pina3@be*.ne*>
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Secondary Regulator Position
Pina
The slightly longer hose necessary for an underarm carry would seem to make the
length irrelevant.
At the worst the hose could be pulled above the shoulder in the event of an
emergency and the slightly longer length would not matter.
Bill

pina wrote:

> If the backup reg hose is long enough to route under your arm, it is too
> long.  It should be 26".
>
> --pina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bigvon@be*.ne* [mailto:bigvon@be*.ne*]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:46 PM
> To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Secondary Regulator Position
>
> Need some DIR reasoning here.
> Why is running the secondary regulator hose under your arm, rather than over
> the shoulder not acceptable? Under the arm would seem to be out of the way,
> low profile, and reduce drag and risk of entanglement.
> Bill
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]