Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:52:33 -0800
From: Paul Braunbehrens <Bakalite@ba*.co*>
Subject: RE: OMS vs PST tank specs
To: trey@ne*.co* (Trey), Ian Puleston <ian@un*.co*>,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com
Thanks Trey, I'll be getting my set soon and will test them.  I doubt 
they have changed anything, but will report back here if they have. 
There are quite a few wrong tank specs floating around on various web 
sites, but this is the PST site.  If it's wrong, I'll let them know 
as well.


Trey wrote:
~
>Obviously not correct. I have four sets from 1971 to 1998. All -9 for a set
>of doubles, and   I checked each and every one of them. Paul, we can not
>chase bullshit from web sites. Either believe it or don't, but unless these
>morons have changed the tank, and that means a whole series of DOT approvals
>for nada, then they fucked up on the web site, or more likely, given that
>they are involved in the dive industry, they have no freaking clue what the
>tanks do, and of course there is the slim chance you got it wrong. 121 PST's
>have exactly the same buoyancy characteristics as the 104's, have them ,
>too, 1998 vintage.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Braunbehrens [mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co*]
>Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 1:03 PM
>To: Trey; Ian Puleston; techdiver@aquanaut.com
>Subject: RE: OMS vs PST tank specs
>
>
>Trey wrote:
>
>>For dry suit diving anywhere, the PST offers a better buoyancy fit as a
>pair
>>are -9 in fresh vs neutral for the Faber. To offset a proper shell suit
>with
>>insulation takes between 20 and 26 pounds, and that is achieved by the
>>tanks, the plate, the light, and the regs, leaving the diver neutral at all
>>depths with little or no gas, and negative by the amount of the gas when
>>full, plus or minus a little depending on the insulation and the diver,
>with
>>the light being droppable in an emergency to get up.
>
>
>Now I'm completely confused!  The pst site has these figures:
>LP-104	104 CU.FT.	8.00	26.19	45 LBS	-0.7 LBS
>
>which would make a set of doubles only 1.5 pounds negative!
>
>Are we talking about the same tank?
>--
>Paul B.

-- 
Paul B.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]