Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:58:04 -0800
From: Paul Braunbehrens <Bakalite@ba*.co*>
Subject: Re: OMS vs PST tank specs
To: Dave Grey <grey@is*.ca*>, Ian Puleston <ian@un*.co*>,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com
What a huge surprise!  LOL.  I haven't been happy with a single thing 
I've purchased from OMS!

Dave Grey wrote:
~
>Without getting into buoyancy comparisons,I would like to make the following
>comments;
>OMS tanks are Faber tanks.OMS has re-branded/re-marketed them with their own
>paint job and their own bullshit imprints.
>I have,amongst others, three sets of  Faber/OMS branded 1997 double 131's .I
>bought these tanks brand new.The OMS paint job separated from the mickey
>mouse powdercoated galvanizing resulting in major bubbling.Obviously these
>tanks could not be used on a continuing basis.As usual,the dive shop idiots
>disclaimed any responsibility and guess what the response from OMS was??
>Anyway,I am fortunate enough to have the facilities to properly strip these
>tanks and to properly re-coat them with appropriate finishes.
>I can only cringe at the the thought of other less fortunate souls who made
>the same mistake  of purchasing OMS branded tanks that I did.
>Later,
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ian Puleston" <ian@un*.co*>
>To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:07 PM
>Subject: OMS vs PST tank specs
>
>
>>  I was looking at the tank specs for OMS and PST tanks LP tanks the other
>>  day. PST say their 104 has a capacity of 104 cu ft at 2640psi, and weighs
>>  45lbs without valve. OMS say their 108 has a capacity of 112 cu ft at
>>  2640psi, and weighs 41lbs with valve. Both state a liquid capacity of 17
>>  litres.
>>
>>  Firstly, two tanks with the same liquid capacity cannot have different air
>>  capacities at the same pressure, so someone ain't telling the whole
>truth -
>>  anyone know how the volumes really compare.
>>
>>  Secondly, the significantly lower weight of the OMS tank seems to make it
>a
>>  better choice for ocean diving, but up to now I've been lead to believe
>that
>>  the PSTs are a better choice. Anyone have any opinions between the two for
>>  ocean diving?
>>
>>  I got the specs from the manufacturers brochures, but FYI they're also to
>be
>>  found at:
>>
>>  OMS:
>>  http://www.h2oadventuregear.com/productinfo/tanks.html (note the PST specs
>>  here are wrong).
>>
>>  PST:
>>  http://scubadiving.com/gear/27tanktips/stats.shtml
>>  http://www.pstscuba.com/aaspo.htm (not much detail)
>>
>>  Ian
>>
>>  P.S. - I know there was a recent thread about ALs for ocean so don't start
>>  that over again - I just want to know how these two compare for ocean use.
>>
>>  --
>>  Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>>  Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

-- 
Paul B.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]