Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Don Burke" <donburke56@ne*.ne*>
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: DIHUL, was: Fins question
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:51:36 -0500
From: Marv <ajmarve@ba*.ne*>

> ok
> first, if you read Pauls post you should have been able to infer that he
> was discussing the weight of the tanks on dry land.

The _only_ place that is true is on dry land.  For a given gas capacity, a
diver wearing aluminum tanks is a bit heavier on the boat since the
displacement of the aluminum requires wearing more weight.

> If you ever tried to lift a set of 104s and then right away move a set
> of 80's, like i do when im filling in my garage, you would see the
> difference between the two,

That's comparing apples and watermelons.
A steel 80 is a bit lighter than an aluminum 80.
A Luxfer 80 goes about 35# vs 27# for a PST 80.  In the water, the PST will
take a couple of pounds of weight off your belt/v-weight.  I've never seen a
PST 80 and don't need one, so I'm not going to shop for one.

I made up a set of AL 80s and I'm wearing 11# of lead (with a steel plate)
with a wetsuit in fresh water.  I haven't hit the ocean with these yet, so
my calculation of 17# is approximate at best.  As soon as I go dry, those
tanks will become deco/stage/rec bottles.  If I didn't already own the AL
80s, I certainly wouldn't have bought them.

Those 104s are a pretty heavy item as steel tanks go.  They weigh about the
same as an OMS 125.

Capt JT wears a set of 104s and more power to him.  I haven't asked him what
he like about them.
I have a welder and a generator I can lift when I feel the need for a
hernia. :)
I think I'll go for 112s when I get to that.

> and it should have been one fifth the cost
> and one third the wt,

I disagree with either combination of these.

> as you can see from you chart  the al is 2/3 the
> wt of steel,

The wall thickness on an aluminum tank is so much greater than that of a
steel tank, the weight of the tank is more and the displacement is more.

> and used 80s go around 50 bucks a piece here, while steel
> anything is in the 280 range at least.

For $280 here, I'm getting near the price of a new steel tank.  I don't shop
for tanks much, so that isn't based on a big sample.

> btw ive seen half a dozen internet tank charts, all different ##'s. to
> each his own i guess..............

Please point me toward a chart that shows a steel 80 weighing three times
the weight of an aluminum 80.
I believe you will have more than a little difficulty finding one.

Don Burke
Chesapeake, VA.


Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]