Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
--part1_5d.4668602.27614cf0_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My husband bought a pair of bungeed Dive Rite Rec Wings before he starting moving towards DIR. As he started DIR equipment configurations he cut the bungee out of them and that is what he has been using. I have inherited them for this spring while he'll go for the halcyon wings. Take Care, Allyson Clagett In a message dated 12/7/2000 3:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, bob@bo*.fs*.co*.uk* writes: > Subj: Dive-Rite Recwings - DIR? > Date: 12/7/2000 3:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time > From: bob@bo*.fs*.co*.uk* (Bob Cooper) > To: techdiver@aquanaut.com > > > > > Bungied wings are bad right? So, from the Dive-Rite range a 'rec wing' is > bungied and a 'classic wing' is not. In fact I think the only wing without > a bungy is the 'classic wing'. Has anybody ever considered cutting the > bungy away from the recwing together with the five plastic 'tubes' and > guides around the wing that hold the bungy? Looking at the recwing it > looks like a simple solution. Loosing the bungy and the rest of the > paraphernalia that goes with it will result is a smooth shaped wing which > when diving will lay smoothly against the tanks where the buoyancy is > needed. > > What do you think? > > Bob > > --part1_5d.4668602.27614cf0_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>My husband bought a pair of bungeed Dive Rite Rec Wings before he starting <BR>moving towards DIR. As he started DIR equipment configurations he cut the <BR>bungee out of them and that is what he has been using. I have inherited them <BR>for this spring while he'll go for the halcyon wings. <BR> <BR>Take Care, <BR>Allyson Clagett <BR> <BR>In a message dated 12/7/2000 3:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, <BR>bob@bo*.fs*.co*.uk* writes: <BR> <BR> <BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj: <B>Dive-Rite Recwings - DIR?</B> <BR>Date: 12/7/2000 3:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time <BR><I>From: bob@bo*.fs*.co*.uk* (Bob Cooper) <BR>To: techdiver@aquanaut.com <BR></I> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>Bungied wings are bad right? So, from the Dive-Rite range a 'rec wing' is <BR>bungied and a 'classic wing' is not. In fact I think the only wing without <BR>a bungy is the 'classic wing'. Has anybody ever considered cutting the <BR>bungy away from the recwing together with the five plastic 'tubes' and <BR>guides around the wing that hold the bungy? Looking at the recwing it <BR>looks like a simple solution. Loosing the bungy and the rest of the <BR>paraphernalia that goes with it will result is a smooth shaped wing which <BR>when diving will lay smoothly against the tanks where the buoyancy is <BR>needed. <BR> <BR>What do you think? <BR> <BR>Bob <BR> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE> <BR> <BR></FONT></HTML> --part1_5d.4668602.27614cf0_boundary-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]