Nelson Are you following this same concept with the 80% you use at 20 ft and above. Greg Z. NPerry255@ao*.co* wrote: > Greg, > There are several difficulties trying to deco to the surface on 36% > Nitrox (vs. 50% O2), if you lose your O2: first, just from a practical > standpoint, you need too much gas -- if you run a conventional > Haldanian/Buhlman deco program, inc. a good one, like GUE Deco Planner, your > 20' and 10' stops on EAN36 will be excessively long (remember, Manos was > inquiring about a sub-200' dive) and you probably won't have the gas > required; but even if you do, the QUALITY of decompression is poor ~ think of > it as trying to deco from 110' to the surface on 64% Nitrogen!! If you're > lucky, you might get away with it (not get bent) -- but 50% O2 is much more > effective from 70' all the way up... why risk using an inferior deco gas > (36%)? > I used to do EAN36, because that's how I was originally taught ( -----> > lots to unlearn); but since switching to 50% O2, I feel MUCH better, both > during and after the dive ~ less fatigue, more alert (I think George > mentioned tiredness as a typical sub-clinical result of high N2 loads...). > Perhaps in the last analysis, the best summary I've heard is a quote > attributed to Dr. Bill Hamilton: "What works, works..." ~ and 50% O2 is > what works. > Hope this clarifies, > Nelson Perry > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]