Nelson
Are you following this same concept with the 80% you use at 20 ft and above.
Greg Z.
NPerry255@ao*.co* wrote:
> Greg,
> There are several difficulties trying to deco to the surface on 36%
> Nitrox (vs. 50% O2), if you lose your O2: first, just from a practical
> standpoint, you need too much gas -- if you run a conventional
> Haldanian/Buhlman deco program, inc. a good one, like GUE Deco Planner, your
> 20' and 10' stops on EAN36 will be excessively long (remember, Manos was
> inquiring about a sub-200' dive) and you probably won't have the gas
> required; but even if you do, the QUALITY of decompression is poor ~ think of
> it as trying to deco from 110' to the surface on 64% Nitrogen!! If you're
> lucky, you might get away with it (not get bent) -- but 50% O2 is much more
> effective from 70' all the way up... why risk using an inferior deco gas
> (36%)?
> I used to do EAN36, because that's how I was originally taught ( ----->
> lots to unlearn); but since switching to 50% O2, I feel MUCH better, both
> during and after the dive ~ less fatigue, more alert (I think George
> mentioned tiredness as a typical sub-clinical result of high N2 loads...).
> Perhaps in the last analysis, the best summary I've heard is a quote
> attributed to Dr. Bill Hamilton: "What works, works..." ~ and 50% O2 is
> what works.
> Hope this clarifies,
> Nelson Perry
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]